Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32697323›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Assessment of the Accuracy of Using ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes to Identify Pneumonia Etiology in Patients Hospitalized With Pneumonia.

Thomas L Higgins, Abhishek Deshpande, Marya D Zilberberg, Peter K Lindenauer, Peter B Imrey, Pei-Chun Yu, Sarah D Haessler, Sandra S Richter, Michael B Rothberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05568654 (Reducing Antimicrobial Overuse Through Targeted Therapy for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05568654 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Reducing Antimicrobial Overuse Through Targeted Therapy for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2022 to 2026Enrolled28,580ConditionsCommunity-Acquired Pneumonia, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Point-of-Care TestingArmsRapid Diagnostic Testing, Pharmacist-led de-escalation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas L HigginsThe Center for Case Management, Natick, Massachusetts.
Abhishek DeshpandeCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Marya D ZilberbergEviMed Research Group LLC, Goshen, Massachusetts.
Peter K LindenauerInstitute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield.
Peter B ImreyDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Pei-Chun YuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sarah D HaesslerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield.
Sandra S RichterDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael B RothbergCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

Reducing Antimicrobial Overuse in HCAP Through Personalized Antimicrobial RecommendationsR01HS024277 · AHRQ · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI ROTHBERG, MICHAEL B · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Administrative databases may offer efficient clinical data collection for studying epidemiology, outcomes, and temporal trends in health care delivery. However, such data have seldom been validated against microbiological laboratory results. Objective: To assess the validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) organism-specific administrative codes for pneumonia using microbiological data (test results for blood or respiratory culture, urinary antigen, or polymerase chain reaction) as the criterion standard. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study conducted between February 2017 and June 2019 using data from 178 US hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients were aged 18 years or older admitted with pneumonia and discharged between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2015. Data were analyzed from February 14, 2017, to June 27, 2019. Exposures: Organism-specific pneumonia identified from ICD-9 codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ICD-9 codes using microbiological data as the criterion standard. Results: Of 161 529 patients meeting inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 69.5 [16.2] years; 51.2% women), 35 759 (22.1%) had an identified pathogen. ICD-9-coded organisms and laboratory findings differed notably: for example, ICD-9 codes identified only 14.2% and 17.3% of patients with laboratory-detected methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, respectively. Although specificities and negative predictive values exceeded 95% for all codes, sensitivities ranged downward from 95.9% (95% CI, 95.3%-96.5%) for influenza virus to 14.0% (95% CI, 8.8%-20.8%) for parainfluenza virus, and positive predictive values ranged downward from 91.1% (95% CI, 89.5%-92.6%) for Staphylococcus aureus to 57.1% (95% CI, 39.4%-73.7%) for parainfluenza virus. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, ICD-9 codes did not reliably capture pneumonia etiology identified by laboratory testing; because of the high specificities of ICD-9 codes, however, administrative data may be useful in identifying risk factors for resistant organisms. The low sensitivities of the diagnosis codes may limit the validity of organism-specific pneumonia prevalence estimates derived from administrative data.

Indexed as

Microbiological TechniquesPneumoniaAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitalizationHumansInpatientsInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32697323
PMCPMC7376393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.