ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2020
Development of an animated infographic on Permanent Health Education.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative study on the impact of 'Infographic versus video feedback' on enhancing students' clinical skills in basic life support.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Child vaccination in animated infographic: technology for permanent education about the nursing process.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2023Article
- Managerial Competencies Engaged in Innovative Actions in Primary Health Care: A Qualitative Study of Brazilian Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2023Article
- Designing Infographics: Visual Representations for Enhancing Education, Communication, and Scientific Research.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Preparing Infographics for Post-publication Promotion of Research on Social Media.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto create an animated infographic on the concept of Permanent Health Education according to the National Policy and its main differences compared to continuing education and health education.
methoda methodological study that analyzed context and knowledge gaps with a literature review and brainstorming; synthesized knowledge into a concept map; built and validated a script; created a didactic design; and produced infographic media. 18 representatives from the Center for Permanent Education and Humanization participated in the stages of context analysis and synthesis of knowledge, and six specialists participated in the validation of the script.
resultsthrough the combination of texts, images, audios, animations and transitions, the concepts, principles and legal journey of the Permanent Education policy were presented with examples from daily work and, at the end, the difference compared to continuing education and health education is presented. The specialist on the theme evaluated the infographic positively as it has clear information that meet the needs of the target audience; favors learning; and is able to circulate in the scientific environment.
conclusionthe infographic includes content on Permanent Health Education as it represents the daily work scenario and encourages reflection by the health care workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.