Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696417›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2020

Bioengineering Approaches for Corneal Regenerative Medicine.

S Sharareh Mahdavi, Mohammad J Abdekhodaie, Shohreh Mashayekhan, Alireza Baradaran-Rafii, Ali R Djalilian

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biomaterials for Corneal Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Transforming meat waste into sustainable corneal keratoplasty models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Tissue Engineering and Ophthalmology.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Cell-based Therapies for Corneal and Retinal Disorders.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Extracellular-Vesicle-Based Therapeutics in Neuro-Ophthalmic Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S Sharareh MahdaviDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 1393 Azadi Ave., Tehran, 11365-11155, Iran.
Mohammad J AbdekhodaieDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 1393 Azadi Ave., Tehran, 11365-11155, Iran. abdmj@sharif.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3998-3142
Shohreh MashayekhanDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 1393 Azadi Ave., Tehran, 11365-11155, Iran.
Alireza Baradaran-RafiiOphthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, SBUMS, Arabi Ave, Daneshjoo Blvd, Velenjak, Tehran, 19839-63113, Iran.
Ali R DjalilianDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1200 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Sharif University of Technology · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Sharif University of Technology G960111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the cornea is responsible for transmitting and focusing light into the eye, injury or pathology affecting any layer of the cornea can cause a detrimental effect on visual acuity. Aging is also a reason for corneal degeneration. Depending on the level of the injury, conservative therapies and donor tissue transplantation are the most common treatments for corneal diseases. Not only is there a lack of donor tissue and risk of infection/rejection, but the inherent ability of corneal cells and layers to regenerate has led to research in regenerative approaches and treatments.

methodsIn this review, we first discussed the anatomy of the cornea and the required properties for reconstructing layers of the cornea. Regenerative approaches are divided into two main categories; using direct cell/growth factor delivery or using scaffold-based cell delivery. It is expected delivered cells migrate and integrate into the host tissue and restore its structure and function to restore vision. Growth factor delivery also has shown promising results for corneal surface regeneration. Scaffold-based approaches are categorized based on the type of scaffold, since it has a significant impact on the efficiency of regeneration, into the hydrogel and non-hydrogel based scaffolds. Various types of cells, biomaterials, and techniques are well covered.

resultsThe most important characteristics to be considered for biomaterials in corneal regeneration are suitable mechanical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and transparency. Moreover, a curved shape structure and spatial arrangement of the fibrils have been shown to mimic the corneal extracellular matrix for cells and enhance cell differentiation.

conclusionTissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches showed to have promising outcomes for corneal regeneration. However, besides proper mechanical and optical properties, other factors such as appropriate sterilization method, storage, shelf life and etc. should be taken into account in order to develop an engineered cornea for clinical trials.

Indexed as

CorneaRegenerative MedicineBiocompatible MaterialsRegenerationTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsBioengineered scaffoldsCell deliveryCorneal regenerationGrowth factorRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID32696417
PMCPMC7373337
OpenAlexW3044781656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.