Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696337›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

County-Level Poverty and Barriers to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in a Health Education and Patient Navigation Program for Rural and Border Texas Residents.

Derek Falk, Catherine Cubbin, Barbara Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global and Rural Health Disparities.Ethnicity & disease · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Derek FalkDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. dfalk@wakehealth.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5929-8874
Catherine CubbinSteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station D3500, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Barbara JonesSteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station D3500, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Cancer Prevention And Control Training Grant (CAPACITY)T32CA122061 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRISTIE L FOLEY, Kathryn Elizabeth Weaver · 2019 to 2026
$2.1M
American Cancer Society 125672-DSW-14-115-01-SWCancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas PP120099Evidence-Based Prevention Programs and Services PP150089NCI NIH HHS T32 CA122061NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study examined the impact of (1) county-level poverty rates and (2) patient navigation on breast and cervical cancer screening outcomes for women in rural and border counties in Texas reporting barriers to screening.Univariate analyses described the distribution and screening prevalence rates in the sample, while a series of random intercept logistic regression models analyzed mammogram (N = 2326 women aged 40+) and Papanicolaou (Pap; N = 2959 women aged 21-64) screening separately.Mammogram and Pap screening prevalence rates were highest among women who were aged 40-64, Spanish-speaking Latinas, lower educated, attending cancer education events because of the cost of the screenings, patient navigation recipients, living in the south region of Texas, and in counties with high poverty. Although models indicated significant variability in screening rates by county, county-level poverty was only significantly associated with odds of getting Pap screening in adjusted models. Not receiving patient navigation vs. receiving it was associated with lower odds for both mammogram (OR: 0.51, CI: 0.38-0.70) and Pap (OR: 0.69, CI: 0.50-0.94) screenings.County-level variation in screening rates exists for both mammogram and Pap tests and should be considered in the development and implementation of screening interventions in rural and border areas. However, other factors beyond poverty levels may explain the variation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient NavigationUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth EducationHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPovertyTexasVaginal SmearsYoung AdultCancer screeningHealth disparitiesHealth educationPatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID32696337
PMCPMC7855227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.