Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696254›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Vessel-selective 4D-MR angiography using super-selective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling may be a useful tool for assessing brain AVM hemodynamics.

Osamu Togao, Makoto Obara, Michael Helle, Koji Yamashita, Kazufumi Kikuchi, Daichi Momosaka, Yoshitomo Kikuchi, Ataru Nishimura, Koichi Arimura, Tatsuhiro Wada and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Perfusion imaging by arterial spin labeling in migraine: A literature review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Arterial Spin Labeling for Pediatric Central Nervous System Diseases: Techniques and Clinical Applications.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Neuroimaging at 7 Tesla: a pictorial narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Perfusion Territory Shifts in Cerebrovascular Diseases Measured by Super-Selective Arterial Spin Labeling.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Osamu TogaoDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Makoto ObaraPhilips Japan, 13-37, Kohnan 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8507, Japan.
Michael HellePhilips Research, Hamburg, Germany.
Koji YamashitaDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kazufumi KikuchiDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Daichi MomosakaDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshitomo KikuchiDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Ataru NishimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Koichi ArimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Tatsuhiro WadaDivision of Radiology, Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroo MurazakiDivision of Radiology, Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koji IiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Marc Van CauterenPhilips Japan, 13-37, Kohnan 2-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8507, Japan.
Akio HiwatashiDepartment of Molecular Imaging & Diagnosis, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. hiwatasi@radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-5083
Kyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JPPhilips (Germany) · DE

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17K10410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the usefulness of 4D-MR angiography based on super-selective pseudo-continuous ASL combined with keyhole and view-sharing (4D-S-PACK) for vessel-selective visualization and to examine the ability of this technique to visualize brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

methodsIn this retrospective study, 15 patients (ten men and five women, mean age 44.0 ± 16.9 years) with brain AVMs were enrolled. All patients were imaged with 4D-PACK (non-selective), 4D-S-PACK, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Observers evaluated vessel selectivity, identification of feeding arteries and venous drainage patterns, visualization scores, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for each AVM component. Measurements were compared between the MR methods.

resultsVessel selectivity was graded 4 in 43/45 (95.6%, observer 1) and 42/45 (93.3%, observer 2) territories and graded 3 in two (observer 1) and three (observer 2) territories. The sensitivity and specificity for identification of feeding arteries for both observers was 88.9% and 100% on 4D-PACK, and 100% and 100% on 4D-S-PACK, respectively. For venous drainage, the sensitivity and specificity was 100% on both methods for observer 1. The sensitivity and specificity for observer 2 was 94.4% and 83.3% on 4D-PACK, and 94.4% and 91.7% on 4D-S-PACK, respectively. The CNRs at the timepoint of 1600 ms were slightly lower in 4D-S-PACK than in 4D-PACK for all AVM components (Feeding artery, p = .02; nidus, p = .001; and draining artery, p = .02). The visualization scores for both observers were not significantly different between 4D-PACK and 4D-S-PACK for all components.

conclusions4D-S-PACK could be a useful non-invasive clinical tool for assessing hemodynamics in brain AVMs. KEY POINTS: • The 4D-MR angiography based on super-selective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling combined with CENTRA-keyhole and view-sharing (4D-S-PACK) enabled excellent vessel selectivity. • The 4D-S-PACK enabled the perfect identification of feeding arteries of brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM). • 4D-S-PACK could be a non-invasive clinical tool for assessing hemodynamics in brain AVMs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionBrainChildFemaleHemodynamicsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpin LabelsArteriovenous malformationsBrainMagnetic resonance angiographyMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID32696254
OpenAlexW3043949480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.