ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Discrimination between transient and persistent subsolid pulmonary nodules on baseline CT using deep transfer learning.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural history and clinical characteristics of pulmonary subsolid nodules in pediatric patients: a cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Software-based quantitative CT analysis to predict the growth trend of persistent nonsolid pulmonary nodules: a retrospective study.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis in endoscopy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Deep learning in bladder cancer imaging: A review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Deep Learning on Enhanced CT Images Can Predict the Muscular Invasiveness of Bladder Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate a deep learning model to discriminate transient from persistent subsolid nodules (SSNs) on baseline CT.
methodsA cohort of 1414 SSNs, consisting of 319 transient SSNs in 168 individuals and 1095 persistent SSNs in 816 individuals, were identified on chest CT. The cohort was assigned by examination date into a development set of 996 SSNs, a tuning set of 212 SSNs, and a validation set of 206 SSNs. Our model was built by transfer learning, which was transferred from a well-performed deep learning model for pulmonary nodule classification. The performance of the model was compared with that of two experienced radiologists. Each nodule was categorized by Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) to further evaluate the performance and the potential clinical benefit of the model. Two methods were employed to visualize the learned features.
resultsOur model achieved an AUC of 0.926 on the validation set with an accuracy of 0.859, a sensitivity of 0.863, and a specificity of 0.858, and outperformed the radiologists. The model performed the best among Lung-RADS 2 nodules and maintained well performance among Lung-RADS 4 nodules. Feature visualization demonstrated the model's effectiveness in extracting features from images.
conclusionsThe transfer learning model presented good performance on the discrimination between transient and persistent SSNs. A reliable diagnosis on nodule persistence can be achieved at baseline CT; thus, an early diagnosis as well as better patient care is available. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning can be used for the discrimination between transient and persistent subsolid nodules. • A transfer learning model can achieve good performance when it is transferred from a model with a similar task. • With the assistance of deep learning model, a reliable diagnosis on nodule persistence can be achieved at baseline CT, which can bring a better patient care strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.