Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696172›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020

Thromboprophylaxis: balancing evidence and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Benjamin Marchandot, Antonin Trimaille, Anais Curtiaud, Kensuke Matsushita, Laurence Jesel, Olivier Morel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-analysis of coagulation parameters associated with disease severity and poor prognosis of COVID-19.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Thromboprophylaxis in Pregnant Women with COVID-19: An Unsolved Issue.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prioritizing studies of COVID-19 and lessons learned.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Practical Recommendations for the Management of Patients with ITP During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. [COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism].Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin MarchandotDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7034-1466
Antonin TrimailleDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Anais CurtiaudDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Kensuke MatsushitaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Laurence JeselDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
Olivier MorelDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France. olivier.morel@chru-strasbourg.fr.
Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common and potent consideration has recently entered the landscape of the novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19): venous thromboembolism (VTE). COVID-19 has been associated to a distinctive related coagulopathy that shows unique characteristics. The research community has risen to the challenges posed by this « evolving COVID-19 coagulopathy » and has made unprecedented efforts to promptly address its distinct characteristics. In such difficult time, both national and international societies of thrombosis and hemostasis released prompt and timely responses to guide recognition and management of COVID-19-related coagulopathy. However, latest guidelines released by the international Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) on May 27, 2020, followed the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) on June 2, 2020 showed some discrepancies regarding thromboprophylaxis use. In this forum article, we would like to offer an updated focus on thromboprophylaxis with current incidence of VTE in ICU and non-ICU patients according to recent published studies; highlight the main differences regarding ISTH and CHEST guidelines; summarize and describe which are the key ongoing RCTs testing different anticoagulation strategies in patients with COVID-19; and finally set a proposal for COVID-19 coagulopathy specific risk factors and dedicated trials.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsBetacoronavirusBlood CoagulationCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic AgentsCoronavirusCOVID-19GuidelinesThromboprophylaxisVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID32696172
PMCPMC7372740
OpenAlexW3044726965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.