Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696145›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Connected Surveillance for Detection of Complications After Early Discharge from Bariatric Surgery.

Maud Neuberg, Marie-Cécile Blanchet, Benoit Gignoux, Vincent Frering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maud NeubergClinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France.
Marie-Cécile BlanchetClinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France.
Benoit GignouxClinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France.
Vincent FreringClinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France. frering@chirurgien-digestif.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6108-551X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of a bariatric enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program, at-home follow-up using a novel Internet application was used to detect early complications. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this "connected surveillance" protocol over a 10-day follow-up. Patients were monitored 24/7 by a trained nursing team with daily surgeon review of patient self-reports. Morbidly obese patients (n = 281) underwent OAGB (126, 47.70%) or sleeve gastrectomy (138, 52.3%). Of 264 who completed the study (mean age 40 years [20-66]), 3 (1.1%) underwent revision for early complications; there were 6 (2.1%) readmissions and 22 (8.3%) consultations. In a bariatric surgery ERAS program, "Internet-connected surveillance" proved safe and effective in detecting 100% of early complications, and most patients were satisfied with their care.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidAdultGastrectomyHumansPatient DischargePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesConnected surveillanceEnhanced recovery after surgeryERAS, bariatric surgeryOAGBOne-anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID32696145
PMCPMC7524703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.