Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696088›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2020

Electroencephalography during SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: practical recommendations from the task force of the Italian Society of Neurophysiology (SINC), the Italian League Against Epilepsy (LICE), and the Italian Association of Neurophysiology Technologists (AITN).

Antonello Grippo, Giovanni Assenza, Maenia Scarpino, Lidia Broglia, Rosalia Cilea, Carlo Andrea Galimberti, Giovanni Lanzo, Roberto Michelucci, Laura Tassi, Maurizio Vergari and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cognitive telerehabilitation in neurological patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. A nationwide survey on clinical neurophysiology education in Italian schools of specialization in neurology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on intensive rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injuries.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Response to Canadian Neurophysiology Laboratory COVID-19 Practice Guidelines.The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Response from Authors to the Letter to the Editor.The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Electroencephalography at the time of Covid-19 pandemic in Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Antonello Grippo *SODc Neurophysiopathology, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Giovanni AssenzaUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. g.assenza@unicampus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-4348
Maenia Scarpino *SODc Neurophysiopathology, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Lidia BrogliaUOC Neurology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Rome1, Rome, Italy.
Rosalia CileaIRCSS Neurological Sciences, Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo Andrea GalimbertiIRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni LanzoSODc Neurophysiopathology, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Roberto MichelucciIRCSS Neurological Sciences, Bellaria, Bologna, Italy.
Laura Tassi"Claudio Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Center, ASST Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio VergariIRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo Di LazzaroUnit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Oriano MecarelliDepartment of Human Neurosciencies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
SINC, LICE, and AITN
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITInstitute of Neurological Sciences · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITOspedale San Filippo Neri · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring COVID-19 lockdown, non-urgent medical procedures were suspended. Grade of urgency of electroencephalography (EEG) may vary according to the clinical indication, setting, and status of infection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. "Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology" (SINC), "Italian League Against Epilepsy" (LICE), and the "Italian Association of Neurophysiology Technologists" (AITN) aimed to provide clinical and technical recommendation for EEG indications and recording standards in this pandemic era.

methodsPresidents of SINC, LICE, and AITN endorsed three members per each society to formulate recommendations: classification of the degree of urgency of EEG clinical indications, management and behavior of physicians and neurophysiology technologists, hygiene and personal protection standards, and use of technical equipment.

resultsScientific societies endorsed a paper conveying the recommendation for EEG execution in accordance with clinical urgency, setting (inpatients/outpatients), status of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection (positive, negative and uncertain), and phase of governmental restrictions (phase 1 and 2). Briefly, in phase 1, EEG was recommended only for those acute/subacute neurological symptoms where EEG is necessary for diagnosis, prognosis, or therapy. Outpatient examinations should be avoided in phase 1, while they should be recommended in urgent cases in phase 2 when they could prevent an emergency room access. Reduction of staff contacts must be encouraged through rescheduling job shifts. The use of disposable electrodes and dedicated EEG devices for COVID-19-positive patients are recommended.

conclusionsDuring the different phases of COVID-19 pandemic, the EEG should be reserved for patients really benefiting from its execution in terms of diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and avoidance of emergency room access.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAdvisory CommitteesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksElectroencephalographyEpilepsyHumansItalyMedical Laboratory PersonnelNeurophysiologyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPractice Guidelines as TopicSARS-CoV-2Societies, MedicalCOVID-19EEGItalyNeurophysiologyRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID32696088
PMCPMC7371961
OpenAlexW3044109945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.