Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696074›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2020

Predicting intelligence from brain gray matter volume.

Kirsten Hilger, Nils R Winter, Ramona Leenings, Jona Sassenhagen, Tim Hahn, Ulrike Basten, Christian J Fiebach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Olfactory processing in gifted and non-gifted children: assessing the sniffin' sticks olfactory test for threshold, discrimination, and identification abilities.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kirsten HilgerDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. kirsten.hilger@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-5884
Nils R WinterInstitute of Translational Psychiatry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-1492
Ramona LeeningsInstitute of Translational Psychiatry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jona SassenhagenDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Tim HahnInstitute of Translational Psychiatry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Ulrike BastenDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian J FiebachDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0827-1721

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FI 848/6-1European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement n° 617891 FP7/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A positive association between brain size and intelligence is firmly established, but whether region-specific anatomical differences contribute to general intelligence remains an open question. Results from voxel-based morphometry (VBM) - one of the most widely used morphometric methods - have remained inconclusive so far. Here, we applied cross-validated machine learning-based predictive modeling to test whether out-of-sample prediction of individual intelligence scores is possible on the basis of voxel-wise gray matter volume. Features were derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging data (N = 308) using (a) a purely data-driven method (principal component analysis) and (b) a domain knowledge-based approach (atlas parcellation). When using relative gray matter (corrected for total brain size), only the atlas-based approach provided significant prediction, while absolute gray matter (uncorrected) allowed for above-chance prediction with both approaches. Importantly, in all significant predictions, the absolute error was relatively high, i.e., greater than ten IQ points, and in the atlas-based models, the predicted IQ scores varied closely around the sample mean. This renders the practical value even of statistically significant prediction results questionable. Analyses based on the gray matter of functional brain networks yielded significant predictions for the fronto-parietal network and the cerebellum. However, the mean absolute errors were not reduced in contrast to the global models, suggesting that general intelligence may be related more to global than region-specific differences in gray matter volume. More generally, our study highlights the importance of predictive statistical analysis approaches for clarifying the neurobiological bases of intelligence and provides important suggestions for future research using predictive modeling.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainFemaleGray MatterHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntelligenceIntelligence TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizeYoung AdultBrain sizeGray matter volumeIntelligenceMachine learningPredictionVoxel-based morphometry (VBM)

Identifiers

PMID32696074
PMCPMC7473979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.