Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696061›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical pathology2020

Integration of Genomic Medicine in Pathology Resident Training.

Richard L Haspel, Jonathan R Genzen, Jay Wagner, Christina M Lockwood, Karen Fong, Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG) Working Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 18 institutions in 5 countries.

Richard L HaspelDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Jonathan R GenzenDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Jay WagnerAmerican Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), Chicago, IL.
Christina M LockwoodDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Karen FongAmerican Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), Chicago, IL.
Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG) Working Group
Washington University in St. Louis · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of New Mexico · USAmerican Society for Clinical Pathology · USAmerican Society for Investigative Pathology · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

A National Curriculum in Cancer Genomics for Residents and Medical StudentsR25CA168544 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Richard L Haspel · 2012 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA168544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess current pathology resident training in genomic and molecular pathology.

methodsThe Training Residents in Genomics (TRIG) Working Group has developed survey questions for the pathology Resident In-Service Examination (RISE) since 2012. Responses to these questions, as well as knowledge questions, were analyzed.

resultsA total of 2,529 residents took the 2019 RISE. Since 2013, there has been an increase in postgraduate year 4 (PGY4) respondents indicating training in genomic medicine (58% to approximately 80%) but still less than almost 100% each year for molecular pathology. In 2019, PGY4 residents indicated less perceived knowledge and ability related to both genomic and traditional molecular pathology topics compared with control areas. Knowledge question results supported this subjective self-appraisal.

conclusionsThe RISE is a powerful tool for assessing the current state and also trends related to resident training in genomic pathology. The results show progress but also the need for improvement in not only genomic pathology but traditional molecular pathology training as well.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducational MeasurementGenomicsHumansOnline SystemsPathology, MolecularSurveys and QuestionnairesGenomicsMedical educationNext-generation sequencingPathologyResidency training

Identifiers

PMID32696061
PMCPMC7610262
OpenAlexW3044364074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.