Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32696040›Full record

SynthesisBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Metasubtract: an R-package to analytically produce leave-one-out meta-analysis GWAS summary statistics.

Ilja M Nolte

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Shared Genetic Basis Underlying Myopia-Exotropia Comorbidity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evidence of increased risk of five psychiatric disorders due to antidepressants.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Polygenic risk-based prediction of heart failure in young patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis from UK Biobank.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Addressing overfitting bias due to sample overlap in polygenic risk scoring.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ilja M Nolte

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summarystatistics from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (meta-GWAS) can be used for many follow-up analyses. One valuable application is the creation of polygenic scores. However, if polygenic scores are calculated in a validation cohort that was part of the meta-GWAS consortium, this cohort is not independent and analyses will therefore yield inflated results. The R package 'MetaSubtract' was developed to subtract the results of the validation cohort from meta-GWAS summary statistics analytically. The statistical formulas for a meta-analysis were inverted to compute corrected summary statistics of a meta-GWAS leaving one (or more) cohort(s) out. These formulas have been implemented in MetaSubtract for different meta-analyses methods (fixed effects inverse variance or square root sample size weighted z-score) accounting for no, single or double genomic control correction. Results obtained by MetaSubtract correlate very well to those calculated using the traditional way, i.e. by performing a meta-analysis leaving out the validation cohort. In conclusion, MetaSubtract allows researchers to compute meta-GWAS summary statistics that are independent of the GWAS results of the validation cohort without requiring access to the cohort level GWAS results of the corresponding meta-GWAS consortium. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MetaSubtract. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenotypeHumansMultifactorial InheritanceSample SizeSoftware

Identifiers

PMID32696040
PMCPMC7750933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.