Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32695931›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2020

Congenital isolated idiopathic episcleral arteriovenous malformation.

Aastha Gandhi, Mayuresh Naik, Anuj Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aastha GandhiRoom no. 430 of Eye OPD, 4th Floor of OPD Building, Department of Ophthalmology, V.M.M.C & Safdarjung Hospital, Ring Road, Ansari Nagar, NewDelhi, 110029, India.
Mayuresh NaikRoom no. 3 of Eye OPD, 1st Floor of OPD Building, Department of Ophthalmology, H.I.M.S.R & H.A.H.Centenary Hospital, Near GK-2, Alaknanda, NewDelhi, 110062, India.
Anuj MehtaRoom no. 430 of Eye OPD, 4th Floor of OPD Building, Department of Ophthalmology, V.M.M.C & Safdarjung Hospital, Ring Road, Ansari Nagar, NewDelhi, 110029, India.
Safdarjang Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report the occurrence of an episcleral AVM and to discuss the gravity as well as management of dilated tortuous episcleral vasculature. OBSERVATION: A 16-year-old Asian male presented with redness in the left eye since birth and a history of gradual painless progressive increase in size since the past two years, causing a cosmetic concern for the patient. There was no history of any diminution of vision, diplopia, headache, trauma or any similar lesions anywhere in the body.On examination, unaided visual acuity (UCVA) was 6/6 Snellen in both eyes. Hirschberg's reflex was central and extraocular movements were full and free in both the eyes.On slit-lamp examination, dilated tortuous episcleral vessels were found in the temporal aspect of the palpebral aperture, shaped like a single continuous vascular frond, vertically measuring 10-11mm in extent and horizontally commencing 6mm from the temporal limbus but the posterior limit could not be discernible. The episcleral plane was freely mobile from the overlying conjunctiva and underlying sclera. The dilated episcleral vasculature remained unchanged on Valsalava maneuver and on bending forward.Intraocular pressure was 14 mmHg by Goldmann's appalanation tonometer in both eyes. Iris was normal in configuration and gonioscopy revealed open angles without any evidence of any neovascularisation in both eyes. Fundus examination was unremarkable.USG B-scan was grossly normal. MR Angiography of head and orbit with using thin high-resolution cuts (1mm using 3T machine) was done and was later followed up with a Contrast Enhanced MRI. Both imaging studies revealed an isolated episcleral AVM with a possible feeder vessel from the anterior ciliary artery to the lateral rectus and without any intraorbital or intracranial lesion.A diagnosis of isolated episcleral AVM was made. The episcleral plane was dissected and dilated tortuous vessels were excised. After cautery, conjunctival autograft was obtained from the fellow-eye was used to cover the defect. Histopathological examination revealed both thick and thin walled vessels of varying calibre corresponding to arteries and veins confirming the diagnosis of isolated episcleral AVM. Ref. Fig. 2. No recurrence has been observed over a follow-up period of 1 year.

conclusionAND IMPORTANCE: Isolated idiopathic episcleral AVM should be a diagnosis of exclusion. A thorough systemic and ophthalmological evaluation including a glaucoma workup is necessary for both diagnosis and management. UBM and MRI/MRA may be required in select cases to rule out any associations or complications. Management includes observation, embolization and excision.

Indexed as

AVMEpiscleral AVMValsalva manoeuvre

Identifiers

PMID32695931
PMCPMC7363662
OpenAlexW3041000624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.