Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32695783›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2020

Neurogenesis From Embryo to Adult - Lessons From Flies and Mice.

Helena Mira, Javier Morante

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Repair Manual of a Fruit Fly Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Quiescence Multiverse.Biomolecules · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Temporal regulation of neural diversity in Drosophila and vertebrates.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Homemade: building the structure of the neurogenic niche.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Helena MiraInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Valencia, Spain.
Javier MoranteInstituto de Neurociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas y Universidad Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain is composed of billions of cells, including neurons and glia, with an undetermined number of subtypes. During the embryonic and early postnatal stages, the vast majority of these cells are generated from neural progenitors and stem cells located in all regions of the neural tube. A smaller number of neurons will continue to be generated throughout our lives, in localized neurogenic zones, mainly confined at least in rodents to the subependymal zone of the lateral ventricles and the subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus. During neurogenesis, a combination of extrinsic cues interacting with temporal and regional intrinsic programs are thought to be critical for increasing neuronal diversity, but their underlying mechanisms need further elucidation. In this review, we discuss the recent findings in

Indexed as

adult neurogenesisextrinsic factorsgliaintrinsic factorsneural progenitorsneural stem cellsneurogenesisniche

Identifiers

PMID32695783
PMCPMC7339912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.