Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32695618›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020

Applicability of bacterial cellulose in cosmetics - bibliometric review.

Ritanara Tayane Bianchet, Anelise Leal Vieira Cubas, Marina Medeiros Machado, Elisa Helena Siegel Moecke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of Biotechnological Active Peptides Secreted byAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. EnhancingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Controlled release of vitamin DScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  17. Surface Modification of Bacterial Cellulose for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ritanara Tayane BianchetUniversity of South Santa Catarina, 88137-270, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Anelise Leal Vieira CubasUniversity of South Santa Catarina, 88137-270, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Marina Medeiros MachadoUniversity of South Santa Catarina, 88137-270, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Elisa Helena Siegel MoeckeUniversity of South Santa Catarina, 88137-270, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for innovation and new approaches to mitigate environmental impact encourages the cosmetic industry to explore new methodologies and materials. Bacterial cellulose has been the focus of research because it has high biocompatibility, skin adhesion, and water retention, in addition to being a sustainable alternative material. This review paper explored the perspectives emerging in the scientific literature on the use of bacterial cellulose in cosmetics. This bibliometric review was performed using four databases along with three software programs to obtain a more complete analysis. The search identified 18 articles related to the topic. Because the highest number of articles was published in the year 2019, it was estimated that more publications will appear in the near future. Studies have demonstrated the potential for the use of bacterial cellulose in face masks for the delivery of active compounds and increased skin hydration, and it can also act as an emulsion stabilizer.

Indexed as

Bacterial celluloseCosmeticsGluconacetobacter xylinus

Identifiers

PMID32695618
PMCPMC7360852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.