ArticleMethodsX2020
Modification of the EPA method 1631E for the quantification of total mercury in natural waters.
Article in MethodsX, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Over a decade of atmospheric mercury monitoring at Amsterdam Island in the French Southern and Antarctic Lands.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Seven-year monitoring of mercury in wet precipitation and atmosphere at the Amsterdam Island GMOS station.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Analytical study on the primary and secondary organic carbon and elemental carbon in the particulate matter at the high-altitude Monte Curcio GAW station, Italy.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Improving the Voltammetric Determination of Hg(II): A Comparison Between Ligand-Modified Glassy Carbon and Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide Electrodes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To support the effectiveness of the Minamata Convention, the accurate determinations of mercury (Hg) in natural waters is an important but certainly challenging task due to the low concentrations expected in ambient samples. Mercury contamination may occur from many sources such as the unproperly-cleaning of storage bottles or the use of reagents for sample analysis with Hg traces, thus leading the analyst to easily run into errors. In our work, we propose some key modifications to the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) method 1631E aimed at reducing the Hg contamination of reagents, storage containers, and minimizing the carryover effect in the instrumental line of sampling. The changes introduced have been tailored for the use of the method with cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (CV-AFS) instrumentation and tested as part of a United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) ring test. Although the edited method was tested with natural water samples, the proposed method improvements can also apply to the Hg analysis in solid matrices that require the prior acid digestion of the samples.•A customized version of the EPA method 1631E is proposed for the analysis of aqueous samples.•New protocols for the reduction of contamination in the storage bottles and reagents used for the preparation of BrCl solution are provided.•A useful strategy for the control of the memory effect is included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.