ArticlePhotoacoustics2020
Simulations and human cadaver head studies to identify optimal acoustic receiver locations for minimally invasive photoacoustic-guided neurosurgery.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Water-sensitive photoacoustic temperature characterization at 960 nm in cerebral vascular phantoms with CT co-registration.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Real-time photoacoustic imaging with freehand light delivery and augmented reality guidance.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- In vivo acoustoelectric neural recording in mice enabled by ultrasound-induced frequency mixing.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- In Vivo Demonstration of Deep Learning-Based Photoacoustic Visual Servoing System.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Photoacoustic imaging combined with robotics: a review of current works.Biomedical optics express · 2025Review
- A Deep Learning-Based Approach to Characterize Skull Physical Properties: A Phantom Study.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Automatic search for photoacoustic marker using automated transrectal ultrasound.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Flexible array transducer for photoacoustic-guided interventions: phantom andBiomedical optics express · 2023Article
- The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Combined Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Image Guidance of Spinal Pedicle Cannulation Demonstrated With Intact ex vivo Specimens.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
- Comparison of compressional and elastic wave simulations for patient-specific planning prior to transcranial photoacoustic-guided neurosurgery.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Article
- Photoacoustic computed tomography for functional human brain imaging [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2021Review
- Photoacoustic-guided surgery from head to toe [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2021Review
- Empirical assessment of laser safety for photoacoustic-guided liver surgeries.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Photoacoustic imaging with fiber optic technology: A review.Photoacoustics · 2020Review
- Photoacoustic imaging for surgical guidance: Principles, applications, and outlook.Journal of applied physics · 2020Article
- GPU implementation of photoacoustic short-lag spatial coherence imaging for improved image-guided interventions.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time intraoperative guidance during minimally invasive neurosurgical procedures (e.g., endonasal transsphenoidal surgery) is often limited to endoscopy and CT-guided image navigation, which can be suboptimal at locating underlying blood vessels and nerves. Accidental damage to these critical structures can have severe surgical complications, including patient blindness and death. Photoacoustic image guidance was previously proposed as a method to prevent accidental injury. While the proposed technique remains promising, the original light delivery and sound reception components of this technology require alterations to make the technique suitable for patient use. This paper presents simulation and experimental studies performed with both an intact human skull (which was cleaned from tissue attachments) and a complete human cadaver head (with contents and surrounding tissue intact) in order to investigate optimal locations for ultrasound probe placement during photoacoustic imaging and to test the feasibility of a modified light delivery design. Volumetric x-ray CT images of the human skull were used to create k-Wave simulations of acoustic wave propagation within this cranial environment. Photoacoustic imaging of the internal carotid artery (ICA) was performed with this same skull. Optical fibers emitting 750 nm light were inserted into the nasal cavity for ICA illumination. The ultrasound probe was placed on three optimal regions identified by simulations: (1) nasal cavity, (2) ocular region, and (3) 1 mm-thick temporal bone (which received 9.2%, 4.7%, and 3.8% of the initial photoacoustic pressure, respectively, in simulations). For these three probe locations, the contrast of the ICA in comparative experimental photoacoustic images was 27 dB, 19 dB, and 12 dB, respectively, with delay-and-sum (DAS) beamforming and laser pulse energies of 3 mJ, 5 mJ, and 4.2 mJ, respectively. Short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC) beamforming improved the contrast of these DAS images by up to 15 dB, enabled visualization of multiple cross-sectional ICA views in a single image, and enabled the use of lower laser energies. Combined simulation and experimental results with the emptied skull and >1 mm-thick temporal bone indicated that the ocular and nasal regions were more optimal probe locations than the temporal ultrasound probe location. Results from both the same skull filled with ovine brains and eyes and the human cadaver head validate the ocular region as an optimal acoustic window for our current system setup, producing high-contrast (i.e., up to 35 dB) DAS and SLSC photoacoustic images within the laser safety limits of a novel, compact light delivery system design that is independent of surgical tools (i.e., a fiber bundle with 6.8 mm outer diameter, 2 mm-diameter optical aperture, and an air gap spacing between the sphenoid bone and fiber tips). These results are promising toward identifying, quantifying, and overcoming major system design barriers to proceed with future patient testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.