ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2019
Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Mapping Methods: Charting Future Priorities for Research Methods in Dissemination and Implementation Science.Research square · 2026Article
- Organizational change readiness for team science: a pathway framework for team science success.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Participatory systems modeling in implementation research: Exploring benefits, facilitators, and future needs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- On the same (evaluation) page: a novel approach to enhance mixed-methods implementation evaluation.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- How Team Science Is Documented and Described in Published Family Medicine Research.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Building capacity and equity in implementation science: evaluation of a national mentored training program.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Building your research team: Insights on hiring, assembling, and leading research teams.JVS-vascular insights · 2025Article
- Recommendations for interdisciplinary research collaboration for early career dissemination and implementation researchers: A multi-phase study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Toward equity in cultivating a "Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Budget impact analysis for implementation decision making, planning, and financing.Translational behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Building trusting relationships in teams to support evidence use and implementation in human services: feasibility and acceptability of a training and coaching approach.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- A mixed-methods analysis to understand the implementation of a multistakeholder research consortium: Environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Application of team science best practices to the project management of a large, multi-site lung cancer screening research consortium.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Behavioral Parent Training for Families With Young Deaf or Hard of Hearing Children Followed in Hearing Health Care.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Training and Career Development in Cardio-Oncology Translational and Implementation Science.Heart failure clinics · 2022Review
- Moving beyond Aim Three: a need for a transdisciplinary approach to build capacity for economic evaluations in implementation science.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Review
- Introduction to theJournal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Collaborating with health economists to advance implementation science: a qualitative study.Implementation science communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionScientific endeavors are increasingly carried out by teams of scientists. While there is growing literature on factors associated with effective science teams, little is known about processes that facilitate the success of dissemination and implementation (D&I) teams studying the uptake of healthcare innovations. This study aimed to identify strategies used by D&I scientists to promote team science.
methodsUsing a nominal group technique, a sample of 27 D&I scholars responded to the question, "What strategies have you or others used to promote team science?" Participants were asked to individually respond and then discuss within a small group to determine the group's top three strategies. Through a facilitated consensus discussion with the full sample, a rank-ordered list of three strategies was determined.
resultsA total of 126 individual responses (
conclusionsBecause of its goal of translating knowledge to practice, D&I research necessitates the use of team science. The top strategies are in line with those found to be effective for teams in other fields and hold promise for improving D&I team cohesion and innovation, which may ultimately accelerate the translation of health innovations and the improvement of care quality and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.