Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32695311›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2020

Recent advances in understanding and managing pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma.

Jessica Gartrell, Alberto Pappo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Staging Systems and Nomograms for Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica GartrellDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1722-2924
Alberto PappoDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a high-grade malignant neoplasm, with a morphologic appearance mimicking that of developing skeletal muscle. Over the last 30 years, patient outcomes have improved with the incorporation of multimodal therapies, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. The overall cure rates exceed 70%, with patients who have low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease experiencing long-term survival rates of >90%, 70%, and <30%, respectively. Historically, RMS was classified according to histology; however, recent advances have revealed new molecular subgroups that allow us to more accurately identify high-, intermediate-, and low-risk disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances made in understanding RMS tumor biology and propose how this understanding can drive a new classification system that can guide clinical approaches for treatment de-escalation in patients with expected favorable outcomes and escalation for those with expected poor outcomes.

Indexed as

RhabdomyosarcomaChildCombined Modality TherapyHumansMuscle, SkeletalRiskpediatricrhabdomyosarcomasarcoma

Identifiers

PMID32695311
PMCPMC7344174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.