Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32695268›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Statistical methods for the estimation of contagion effects in human disease and health networks.

Ran Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ran XuDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contagion effects, sometimes referred to as spillover or influence effects, have long been central to the study of human disease and health networks. Accurate estimation and identification of contagion effects are important in terms of understanding the spread of human disease and health behavior, and they also have various implications for designing effective public health interventions. However, many challenges remain in estimating contagion effects and it is often unclear when it is difficult to correctly estimate contagion effects, or why a particular method would need to be applied. In this review I explain the challenges in estimating contagion effects, and how they can be framed as an omitted variable bias problem. I then discuss how such challenges have been addressed in randomized experiments and traditional statistical analyses, as well as several state-of-the-art statistical methods. Finally, I conclude by summarizing recent advancements and noting remaining challenges, as well as appropriate next steps.

Indexed as

Contagion effectsInstrumental variablesLatent-space modelsNetworksOmitted variable biasStochastic actor-oriented models

Identifiers

PMID32695268
PMCPMC7355717
OpenAlexW3037188156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.