ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020
Rapid preliminary purity evaluation of tumor biopsies using deep learning approach.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occlusion enhanced pan-cancer classification via deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Generalizable transcriptome-based tumor malignant level evaluation and molecular subtyping towards precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Recent advances in blood-based and artificial intelligence-enhanced approaches for gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor biopsy is one of the most widely used materials in cancer diagnoses and molecular studies, where the purity of the biopsies (i.e., proportion of cells that are cancerous) is crucial for both applications. However, conventional approaches for tumor biopsy purity evaluation require experienced pathologists and/or various materials/experiments therefore were time-consuming and error prone. Rapid, easy-to-perform and cost-effective methods are thus still of demand. Recent studies had demonstrated that molecular signatures were informative to this task. Previously, we had developed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.