Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32695210›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

Botanical and Traditional Uses and Phytochemical, Pharmacological, Pharmacokinetic, and Toxicological Characteristics of

Su-Rong He, Chong-Bo Zhao, Jing-Xia Zhang, Jing Wang, Bo Wu, Chun-Jie Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sour Jujube (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. SemenACS omega · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Su-Rong HeCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712046, China.
Chong-Bo ZhaoCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712046, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-1798
Jing-Xia ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712046, China.
Jing WangCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712046, China.
Bo WuCollege of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712046, China.
Chun-Jie WuCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-4427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID32695210
PMCPMC7368963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.