ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of phytochemicals targeting bacterial biofilm and quorum sensing pathways: molecular, microbiological, and mechanistic insights.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Medicinal Plants for Acne Vulgaris: An Evidence-Based Review of Treatments Promoted by Social Media.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Leveraging crude extracts from European tree bark to combat oxidative stress, enhance wound healing, and inhibit pathogenic bacterial growth.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Investigating material basis and molecular mechanism of Qing Cuo formula in the treatment of acne based on animal experiments, UPLC-LTQ-Orbitrap-MS and network pharmacology.Pharmaceutical biology · 2023Article
- How Thymoquinone fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Management of Obesity-Related Inflammatory and Cardiovascular Diseases by Medicinal Plants: From Traditional Uses to Therapeutic Targets.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- An assessment of the evidence for antibacterial activity of stinging nettle (Access microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.