ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2020
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, and Fentanyl in Attenuation Hemodynamic Response of Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05941767 (Comparing Intravenous Versus Nebulized Either Lidocaine or Dexmedetomidine for Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Intubation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing Intravenous Versus Nebulized Either Lidocaine or Dexmedetomidine for Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Intubation
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interaction between intubation and stress regarding hemodynamic and hormonal changes.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Trial
- Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation With Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Review
- Noradrenergic suppression to reduce electroencephalographic arousal after intubation: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.BJA open · 2025Article
- Effect of Vitamin C Infusion on Cerebral Oximetry During General Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy in Diabetic Patients.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Laser Therapy in Lumbar Disc Surgery - A Narrative Review.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2020Review
- Effects of adding dexmedetomidine to nebulized lidocaine on control of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MATERIALS AND
methodsThis clinical trial was conducted on 90 patients, aged 30-70 years, who had heart surgery. The participants were categorized into three groups. Group D received 1
resultsThe age (
conclusionAs a result, dexmedetomidine was not suitable for hemodynamic control and led to hypotension and bradycardia; on the other hand, fentanyl was more effective than two other medications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This trial is registered with IRCT2017013132320N1.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.