SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2020
T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation-Updated Consensus and Review 2020.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimisation of in vitro assays for accurate risk assessment of T-cell responses to biologics with potential immune liabilities.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Structural T-Cell Receptor Analysis in the Age of Machine Learning.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- The immunogenic potential of AZD1402 (Elarekibep) T-cell epitopes in healthy volunteers and drug-exposed clinical trial participants.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Review
- First step towards predicting clinical immunogenicity of biologics using in vitro based readouts as animal trial alternatives.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Article
- Structural and immunogenic evaluation of silk proteins from Bombyx mori using advanced bioinformatics and deep learning for biomaterials applications.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Host cell protein impurities in therapeutic proteins: overview of advances in detection, nonconventional removal technologies and immunogenicity assessment.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Computational Design of a TCR-Based Bispecific Engager Targeting Cancerous KRAS G12V Mutations.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Dual-Phase Immunomodulation by the Bovine β-Casein Peptide KEMPFPK: Insights into Potential TLR Interaction and Gut Microbiota-Mediated Effects.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Natural Language Querying of Immunogenicity Data for Protein Drugs.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Assessment of Immune Responses Against AAV Encoded Transgene Products.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Computational Design and Glycoengineering of Interferon-Lambda for Nasal Prophylaxis Against Respiratory Viruses.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Polymeric Nano-discs: A Versatile Nanocarrier Platform for Delivering Topical Theranostics.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2026Review
- DSCA-HLAII: A dual-stream cross-attention model for predicting peptide-HLA class II interaction and presentation.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Discovery of a first-in-class SLIT2 binder disrupting the SLIT2/ROBO1 axisRSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Host Cell Protein Clinical Safety Risk Assessment-An Updated Industry Review.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune responses to protein and peptide drugs can alter or reduce their efficacy and may be associated with adverse effects. While anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are a standard clinical measure of protein therapeutic immunogenicity, T cell epitopes in the primary sequences of these drugs are the key drivers or modulators of ADA response, depending on the type of T cell response that is stimulated (e.g., T helper or Regulatory T cells, respectively). In a previous publication on T cell-dependent immunogenicity of biotherapeutics, we addressed mitigation efforts such as identifying and reducing the presence of T cell epitopes or T cell response to protein therapeutics prior to further development of the protein therapeutic for clinical use. Over the past 5 years, greater insight into the role of regulatory T cell epitopes and the conservation of T cell epitopes with self (beyond germline) has improved the preclinical assessment of immunogenic potential. In addition, impurities contained in therapeutic drug formulations such as host cell proteins have also attracted attention and become the focus of novel risk assessment methods. Target effects have come into focus, given the emergence of protein and peptide drugs that target immune receptors in immuno-oncology applications. Lastly, new modalities are entering the clinic, leading to the need to revise certain aspects of the preclinical immunogenicity assessment pathway. In addition to drugs that have multiple antibody-derived domains or non-antibody scaffolds, therapeutic drugs may now be introduced via viral vectors, cell-based constructs, or nucleic acid based therapeutics that may, in addition to delivering drug, also prime the immune system, driving immune response to the delivery vehicle as well as the encoded therapeutic, adding to the complexity of assessing immunogenicity risk. While it is challenging to keep pace with emerging methods for the preclinical assessment of protein therapeutics and new biologic therapeutic modalities, this collective compendium provides a guide to current best practices and new concepts in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.