Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32695100›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Expression and Roles of Antimicrobial Peptides in Innate Defense of Airway Mucosa: Potential Implication in Cystic Fibrosis.

Regina Geitani, Carole Ayoub Moubareck, Zhengzhong Xu, Dolla Karam Sarkis, Lhousseine Touqui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exploiting haem-iron dependence of nontypeableFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evaluation ofMediators of inflammation · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Effect of Camel Peptide on the Biofilm ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Regina GeitaniMicrobiology Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Carole Ayoub MoubareckMicrobiology Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Zhengzhong XuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Dolla Karam SarkisMicrobiology Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lhousseine TouquiSorbonne Université, INSERM UMR_S 938, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine (CRSA), Paris, France.
Saint Joseph University · LBInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of respiratory infections is associated with the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the community and clinical settings. Development of new antibiotics is notoriously costly and slow; therefore, alternative strategies are needed. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), the central effector molecules of the immune system, are being considered as alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Most AMPs are epithelium-derived and play a key role in host defense at mucosal surfaces. They are classified on the basis of their structure and amino acid motifs. These peptides display a range of activities, including not only direct antimicrobial activity, but also immunomodulation and wound repair. In the lung, airway epithelial cells and neutrophils, in particular, contribute to AMP synthesis. The relevance of AMPs for host defense against infection has been demonstrated in animal models and is supported by observations in patient studies, showing altered expression and/or unfavorable circumstances for their action in a variety of lung diseases. Of note, AMPs are active against bacterial strains that are resistant to conventional antibiotics, including multidrug-resistant bacteria. Several strategies have been proposed to use these peptides in the treatment of infections, including direct administration of AMPs. In this review, we focus on studies related to direct bactericidal effects of AMPs and their potential clinical applications with a particular focus on cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCystic FibrosisHumansImmunity, InnatePore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsRespiratory MucosaPore Forming Cytotoxic Proteinsantibiotic resistanceantimicrobial effectantimicrobial peptidescystic fibrosisimmune modulationrespiratory infections

Identifiers

PMID32695100
PMCPMC7338688
OpenAlexW3040350057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.