ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2020
Responsible, practical genomic data sharing that accelerates research.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Context of data sharing practices in collaborative human genomic research in low and middle income countries: A systematic review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of (single-cell method) benchmarks reveals the need for extensibility and interoperability.Genome biology · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of non-coding RNA genes with differential expression profiles associated with autism spectrum disorders.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Blood-based biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine and esketamine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Public availability of HIV-1 drug resistance sequence and treatment data: a systematic review.The Lancet. Microbe · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review of the status of veterinary epidemiological research in two species regarding the FAIR guiding principles.BMC veterinary research · 2021Pooled it
- Single-cell Transcriptomics in Autoimmune Diseases: Mechanistic Insights, Cross-disease Convergence, and Translational Challenges in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Type 1 Diabetes, and Multiple Sclerosis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- From traditional histopathology to virtual staining: deep learning approaches for assessing tissue lesions in farmed fish.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Article
- scKSFD: federated distillation model with knowledge sharing for cell type classification of clinical transcriptome data.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Plant genome data sharing: A call toward fully open access.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Autism data sharing: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Ten quick tips for using the NIH Comparative Genomics Resource.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Unlocking the potential of Asian genomic data: a collaborative framework for precision medicine innovation.GigaScience · 2026Review
- FAIR Omics Data Management: Overview, Challenges, and Best Practices.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Structured RDF dataset for genomic feature extraction and detection of biotechnological microorganisms of theData in brief · 2025Article
- Data-sharing practices in publications funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research: implications for health sciences librarians.The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association · 2025Article
- Pre-Meta: priors-augmented retrieval for LLM-based metadata generation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- A step-by-step protocol based on data mining to explore purinergic signaling in glioblastoma.Purinergic signalling · 2025Article
- Methodological opportunities in genomic data analysis to advance health equity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data sharing anchors reproducible science, but expectations and best practices are often nebulous. Communities of funders, researchers and publishers continue to grapple with what should be required or encouraged. To illuminate the rationales for sharing data, the technical challenges and the social and cultural challenges, we consider the stakeholders in the scientific enterprise. In biomedical research, participants are key among those stakeholders. Ethical sharing requires considering both the value of research efforts and the privacy costs for participants. We discuss current best practices for various types of genomic data, as well as opportunities to promote ethical data sharing that accelerates science by aligning incentives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.