Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32694559›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Impact of solid surface hydrophobicity and micrococcal nuclease production on Staphylococcus aureus Newman biofilms.

Abigail M Forson, Henny C van der Mei, Jelmer Sjollema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of TwoMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Micrococcal Nuclease stimulatesFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Bacterial Biofilm Growth on 3D-Printed Materials.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abigail M ForsonUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Henny C van der MeiUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jelmer SjollemaUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Biomedical Engineering, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.sjollema@umcg.nl.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Marie Curie 713482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is commonly associated with biofilm-related infections and contributes to the large financial loss that accompany nosocomial infections. The micrococcal nuclease Nuc1 enzyme limits biofilm formation via cleavage of eDNA, a structural component of the biofilm matrix. Solid surface hydrophobicity influences bacterial adhesion forces and may as well influence eDNA production. Therefore, it is hypothesized that the impact of Nuc1 activity is dependent on surface characteristics of solid surfaces. For this reason, this study investigated the influence of solid surface hydrophobicity on S. aureus Newman biofilms where Nuc1 is constitutively produced. To this end, biofilms of both a wild-type and a nuc1 knockout mutant strain, grown on glass, salinized glass and Pluronic F-127-coated silanized glass were analysed. Results indicated that biofilms can grow in the presence of Nuc1 activity. Also, Nuc1 and solid surface hydrophobicity significantly affected the biofilm 3D-architecture. In particular, biofilm densities of the wild-type strain on hydrophilic surfaces appeared higher than of the mutant nuc1 knockout strain. Since virulence is related to bacterial cell densities, this suggests that the virulence of S. aureus Newman biofilms is increased by its nuclease production in particular on a hydrophilic surface.

Indexed as

MutationBacterial AdhesionBacterial ProteinsBacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsDeoxyribonucleasesGlassHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsPoloxamerStaphylococcus aureusSurface PropertiesBacterial ProteinsDeoxyribonucleasesF-127 compoundPoloxamer

Identifiers

PMID32694559
PMCPMC7374737
OpenAlexW3044401524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.