Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32694131›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2020

Delivery of sexual and reproductive health interventions in conflict settings: a systematic review.

Mariella Munyuzangabo, Dina Sami Khalifa, Michelle F Gaffey, Mahdis Kamali, Fahad J Siddiqui, Sarah Meteke, Shailja Shah, Reena P Jain, Daina Als, Amruta Radhakrishnan and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mariella MunyuzangaboCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dina Sami KhalifaCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle F GaffeyCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mahdis KamaliCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fahad J SiddiquiCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah MetekeCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shailja ShahCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Reena P JainCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-5093
Daina AlsCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amruta RadhakrishnanCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anushka AtaullahjanCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada zulfiqar.bhutta@sickkids.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is essential to provide comprehensive sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions to women affected by armed conflict, but there is a lack of evidence on effective approaches to delivering such interventions in conflict settings. This review synthesised the available literature on SRH intervention delivery in conflict settings to inform potential priorities for further research and additional guidance development.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases using terms related to conflict, women and children, and SRH. We searched websites of 10 humanitarian organisations for relevant grey literature. Publications reporting on conflict-affected populations in low-income and middle-income countries and describing an SRH intervention delivered during or within 5 years after the end of a conflict were included. Information on population, intervention and delivery characteristics were extracted and narratively synthesised. Quantitative data on intervention coverage and effectiveness were tabulated, but no meta-analysis was undertaken.

results110 publications met our eligibility criteria. Most focused on sub-Saharan Africa and displaced populations based in camps. Reported interventions targeted family planning, HIV/STIs, gender-based violence and general SRH. Most interventions were delivered in hospitals and clinics by doctors and nurses. Delivery barriers included security, population movement and lack of skilled health staff. Multistakeholder collaboration, community engagement and use of community and outreach workers were delivery facilitators. Reporting of intervention coverage or effectiveness data was limited. DISCUSSION: There is limited relevant literature on adolescents or out-of-camp populations and few publications reported on the use of existing guidance such as the Minimal Initial Services Package. More interventions for gender-based violence were reported in the grey than the indexed literature, suggesting limited formal research in this area. Engaging affected communities and using community-based sites and personnel are important, but more research is needed on how best to reach underserved populations and to implement community-based approaches. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019125221.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAfrica South of the SaharaArmed ConflictsChildFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansPovertychild healthhealth systems evaluationmental health & psychiatrypublic healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32694131
PMCPMC7375437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.