Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32693988›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery2020

Development and Testing of a Question Prompt List for Common Hand Conditions: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

Ellen S Satteson, Allison K Roe, Sara L Eppler, Jeffrey Yao, Lauren M Shapiro, Robin N Kamal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hand surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen S SattesonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
Allison K RoeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
Sara L EpplerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
Jeffrey YaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
Lauren M ShapiroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
Robin N KamalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA. Electronic address: rnkamal@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · US

Funding

Developing and Testing a Tool for Preference Elicitation in Carpal Tunnel SyndromeK23AR073307 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KAMAL, ROBIN N · 2018 to 2022
$866k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR073307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA question prompt list (QPL) is a tool that lists possible questions a patient may want to ask their surgeon. Its purpose is to improve patient-physician communication and increase patient engagement. Although QPLs have been developed in other specialties, one does not exist for hand conditions. We sought to develop a QPL for use in the hand surgery clinic using a mixed-methods design.

methodsWe drafted a QPL based on prior work outside of hand surgery and then used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design (both qualitative and quantitative methods) to finalize the QPL. Qualitative evaluation included both a written questionnaire completed by a patient advisory board, hand therapists, and hand surgeons, as well as cognitive interviews conducted with clinic patients using the tool. Revisions to the QPL were made after each phase of qualitative analysis. The final QPL was then evaluated quantitatively using the system usability score (SUS) questionnaire to assess its usability.

resultsA patient advisory board consisting of 6 patients, 5 hand therapists, and 6 hand surgeons completed the written questionnaire. Thirteen patients completed a cognitive interview of the QPL. We completed a content analysis of the qualitative data and incorporated the findings into the QPL. Twenty patients then reviewed the final QPL pamphlet and completed the SUS questionnaire. The resulting SUS score of 78.8 indicated above-average usability of the QPL tool.

conclusionsThe QPL developed in this study, from the perspective of multiple stakeholders, provides a usable tool to engage and prompt patients in asking questions during their visit with their hand surgeon with the potential to improve communication and patient-centered care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides clinicians with a QPL developed for use in the hand surgery clinic setting, aimed at facilitating more thorough patient-provider discussion.

Indexed as

HandPhysician-Patient RelationsCommunicationHumansPatient ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesHand surgerypatient-physician communicationpatient satisfactionqualityquestion prompt list

Identifiers

PMID32693988
PMCPMC8080683
OpenAlexW3043035332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.