ArticleRNA biology2021
Profiling of cis- and trans-acting factors supporting noncanonical splice site activation.
Article in RNA biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alternative splicing of the Snap23 microexon is regulated by MBNL, QKI, and RBFOX2 in a tissue-specific manner and is altered in striated muscle diseases.RNA biology · 2025Article
- Utargetome: A targetome prediction tool for modified U1-snRNAs to identify distal-target positions with improved selectivity.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Introns and Their Therapeutic Applications in Biomedical Researches.Iranian journal of biotechnology · 2023Review
- UnderstandingCancers · 2023Article
- A genetic screen in C. elegans reveals roles for KIN17 and PRCC in maintaining 5' splice site identity.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Exon-independent recruitment of SRSF1 is mediated by U1 snRNP stem-loop 3.The EMBO journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, by combining transcriptomics with functional splicing reporter assays we were able to identify GT > GC > TT as the three highest ranked dinucleotides of human 5' splice sites (5'ss). Here, we have extended our investigations to the proteomic characterization of nuclear proteins that bind to canonical and noncanonical 5'ss. Surprisingly, we found that U1 snRNP binding to functional 5'ss sequences prevented components of the DNA damage response (DDR) from binding to the RNA, suggesting a close link between spliceosome arrangement and genome stability. We demonstrate that all tested noncanonical 5'ss sequences are bona-fide targets of the U2-type spliceosome and are bound by U1 snRNP, including U1-C, in the presence of splicing enhancers. The quantity of precipitated U1-C protein was similar for all noncanonical 5'ss dinucleotides, so that the highly different 5'ss usage was likely due to a later step after early U1 snRNP binding. In addition, we show that an internal GT at positions +5/+6 can be advantageous for splicing at position +1 of noncanonical splice sites. Likewise, and in agreement with previous observations, splicing inactive U1 snRNP binding sites could serve as splicing enhancers, which may also explain the higher abundance of U1 snRNPs compared to other U snRNPs. Finally, we observe that an arginine-serine (RS)-rich domain recruitment to stem loop I of the U1 snRNA is functionally sufficient to promote exon-definition and upstream 3'ss activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.