ArticleJournal of athletic training2020
Telemedicine Experiences of Athletic Trainers and Orthopaedic Physicians for Patients With Musculoskeletal Conditions.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements for Select Shoulder and Forearm Motions.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025Article
- Ethical considerations in telehealth and artificial intelligence for work related musculoskeletal disorders: A scoping review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Disruptions in Standard Care in Patients After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Reliability Analysis of In-person and Virtual Goniometric Measurements of the Upper Extremity.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023Article
- Determinants of Telehealth Continuance Intention: A Multi-Perspective Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Changes in clinical practice perceptions and mental health of sports medicine physicians due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.The Physician and sportsmedicine · 2022Article
- Echoing Mechanism of Juvenile Delinquency Prevention and Occupational Therapy Education Guidance Based on Artificial Intelligence.Occupational therapy international · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Telehealth and Sport-Related Concussion: Baseline Testing, Diagnosis, and Management.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021Article
- Telehealth and Research in Orthopedics: New Means of Care Invites New Barriers to Evidence.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021Article
- The Role of Telehealth in Sideline Management of Sports-Related Injuries.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextTelemedicine is the delivery of medical care from a distance using technology. The integration of telemedicine as a supplement to musculoskeletal-based patient encounters may be feasible in sports medicine.
objectiveTo investigate health care professionals' perceptions of and experiences with telemedicine.
designCross-sectional explanatory sequential mixed-methods study. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsA purposeful sample of 17 athletic trainers from a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I institution and 5 orthopaedic physicians from a sports medicine clinic located 92 miles from the campus. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were trained on the telemedicine platform and used it over 5 months for initial, follow-up, and discharge patient encounters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants completed a preintervention survey containing the Theory of Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Model tool. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent-samples t test. After the intervention period, participants completed individual semistructured interviews that we coded using the consensual qualitative research tradition.
resultsFrom the interviews, the clinicians were characterized as telemedicine adopters (n = 14) or nonadopters (n = 8). The adopters reported higher levels of agreement on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Model tool as compared with nonadopters for all constructs. When comparing adoption status, we identified a difference (P < .01), with nonadopters reporting a low level of agreement for the subjective norm construct. The interviews revealed 5 domains: integration challenges, integration opportunities, collaborative practice, anticipatory socialization to future use, and benefits of integration. The participants indicated that integration challenges centered on "buy in," whereas opportunities aligned with the patient's condition and technology ease of use. They reflected that the telemedicine encounters required more preparation and yet allowed for cooperative behaviors between clinicians. The benefits of telemedicine included convenience and scheduling preferences that encouraged future use.
conclusionsThe integration of telemedicine in sports medicine brought about both challenges and opportunities for collaboration among athletic trainers and physicians that were heavily predetermined by the social pressures of colleagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.