Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32693240›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy2020

First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study.

Rob Goodwin, Fiona Moffatt, Paul Hendrick, Stephen Timmons, Neil Chadborn, Pip Logan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05566925 (Patients' Perceptions of Assessment and Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis on the First Visit in Primary Care - a Qualitative Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05566925 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Patients' Perceptions of Assessment and Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis on the First Visit in Primary Care - a Qualitative Study

TypeobservationalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2022 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsDirect access to physiotherapist for assessment, diagnosis and treatment.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rob GoodwinDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rob.goodwin@nottingham.ac.uk.
Fiona MoffattPhysiotherapy and Sport Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Paul HendrickPhysiotherapy and Sport Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Stephen TimmonsNottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Neil ChadbornFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Pip LoganDivision of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFirst point of contact physiotherapy (FPCP) provides patients direct access to a physiotherapist. Literature demonstrates efficacy of FPCP. Evidence has highlighted the need for cultural shifts from both patient and professional perspectives to optimise FPCP. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of patient awareness and understanding of FPCP to better inform FPCP implementation. DESIGN, SETTING,

participantsA qualitative methodology utilised semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Findings from a previous realist review were used to generate a priori topic guides. Participants included patients, physiotherapists, GPs, administration staff, and commissioners. A thematic analysis was undertaken.

resultsFour themes emerged that are described: level of patient awareness of the FPCP role situated against the GP as first contact practitioner, patients attain an awareness of FPCP from a variety of sources, patient understanding of physiotherapy arises from several sources and is poorly aligned with the FPCP model, characteristics and behaviours of patients influence access to FPCP services. Patient awareness and understanding was poor. Patients tended to view the GP as the default first contact practitioner. Traditional advertising approaches appeared on the whole invisible to patients and there was a reliance on signposting to facilitate patient access.

conclusionFindings from this study can inform implementation of FPCP. Several obstacles to the optimisation of FPCP were highlighted. Improved marketing of physiotherapy generally and FPCP specifically may increase patient awareness and understanding. However, it is likely further time will be required to bring about the cultural shift in public perception required to optimise the potential of FPCP.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth Services AccessibilityPhysical TherapistsProfessional RoleAdultAgedFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesQualitative ResearchMusculoskeletal physiotherapy first contact practitioner

Identifiers

PMID32693240
PMCPMC7456768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.