ArticleJournal of vision2020
A computational observer model of spatial contrast sensitivity: Effects of photocurrent encoding, fixational eye movements, and inference engine.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05004649 (The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Stimulus Variability in Natural Visual Scenes
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- An image-computable spatio-chromatic receptive field model of the midget retinal ganglion cell mosaic across the retina.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- A deep convolutional neural network trained for lightness constancy is susceptible to lightness illusions.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Estimating the contribution of early and late noise in vision from psychophysical data.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Seeing on the fly: Physiological and behavioral evidence show that space-to-space representation and processing enable fast and efficient performance by the visual system.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- High refresh rate display for natural monocular viewing in AOSLO psychophysics experiments.Optics express · 2024Article
- Shape, perspective, and what is and is not perceived: Comment on Morales, Bax, and Firestone (2020).Psychological review · 2023Article
- Modeling surface color discrimination under different lighting environments using image chromatic statistics and convolutional neural networks.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2023Article
- Contrast sensitivity functions in autoencoders.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Article
- In vivo chromatic and spatial tuning of foveolar retinal ganglion cells in Macaca fascicularis.PloS one · 2022Article
- Asymmetries around the visual field: From retina to cortex to behavior.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- The Relationship Between Visual Sensitivity and Eccentricity, Cone Density and Outer Segment Length in the Human Foveola.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Article
- Time-Varying Light Exposure in Chronobiology and Sleep Research Experiments.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Temporal information loss in the macaque early visual system.PLoS biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have recently shown that the relative spatial contrast sensitivity function (CSF) of a computational observer operating on the cone mosaic photopigment excitations of a stationary retina has the same shape as human subjects. Absolute human sensitivity, however, is 5- to 10-fold lower than the computational observer. Here we model how additional known features of early vision affect the CSF: fixational eye movements and the conversion of cone photopigment excitations to cone photocurrents (phototransduction). For a computational observer that uses a linear classifier applied to the responses of a stimulus-matched linear filter, fixational eye movements substantially change the shape of the CSF by reducing sensitivity above 10 c/deg. For a translation-invariant computational observer that operates on the squared response of a quadrature-pair of linear filters, the CSF shape is little changed by eye movements, but there is a two fold reduction in sensitivity. Phototransduction dynamics introduce an additional two fold sensitivity decrease. Hence, the combined effects of fixational eye movements and phototransduction bring the absolute CSF of the translation-invariant computational observer to within a factor of 1 to 2 of the human CSF. We note that the human CSF depends on processing of the retinal representation by many thalamo-cortical neurons, which are individually quite noisy. Our modeling suggests that the net effect of post-retinal noise on contrast-detection performance, when considered at the neural population and behavioral level, is quite small: The inference mechanisms that determine the CSF, presumably in cortex, make efficient use of the information carried by the cone photocurrents of the fixating eye.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.