Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32692766›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Epigenetic age acceleration and clinical outcomes in gliomas.

Chunlei Zheng, Nathan A Berger, Li Li, Rong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic Association Between Epigenetic Aging-Acceleration and the Progression of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Clinical perspectives on the age-related increase of immunosuppressive activity.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chunlei ZhengCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-461X
Nathan A BergerCenter for Science, Health, and Society, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Li LiDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Rong XuCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3127-4795

Funding

Combine computational prediction, network analysis and genetic screening in C elegans to uncover neurodegenerative causes in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG061388 · NIA · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, SHU G., XU, RONG · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
An Integrated Reverse Engineering Approach Toward Rapid drug Re positioning for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG057557 · NIA · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI XU, RONG · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Rapid reverse translational drug repositioningDP2HD084068 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI XU, RONG · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
Construct large-scale phenomes of disease and drugs and develop data-driven systems approaches to understand genetic links between Alzheimer's disease and Neuropsychiatric symptomsR56AG062272 · NIA · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI XU, RONG · 2018 to 2019
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057557NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061388NIA NIH HHS R56 AG062272NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD084068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic age acceleration-the difference between an individual's DNA methylation age and chronological age-is associated with many diseases including cancer. This study aims to evaluate epigenetic age acceleration as a prognostic biomarker for gliomas. DNA methylation data of gliomas patients (516 low-grade and intermediate-grade gliomas and 140 glioblastoma) were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and patient epigenetic ages were computed using Horvath's age prediction model. We used multivariate linear regression to assess the association of epigenetic age acceleration with tumor molecular subtypes, including Codel, Classic-like, G-CIMP-high, G-CIMP-low, Mesenchymal-like and PA-like. Compared with Codel subtype, epigenetic ages in other molecular subtypes show deceleration after controlling age and race. Age deceleration for Classic-like, G-CIMP-high, G-CIMP-low, Mesenchymal-like and PA-like were 15.42 years (CI: 7.98-22.86, p = 5.38E-05), 25.00 years (CI: 20.79-29.22, p = 4.06E-28), 28.56 years (CI: 14.37-42.74, p = 8.75E-05), 45.34 years (CI: 38.80-51.88, p = 2.15E-36), and 53.58 years (CI: 44.90-62.26, p = 4.81E-30), respectively. Then, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association of epigenetic age acceleration with patient overall survival. Our results show epigenetic age acceleration is positively associated with patient overall survival (per 10-year age acceleration, HR = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.82-0.97; p = 9.04E-03) in multivariate analysis. When stratified by molecular subtypes, epigenetic age acceleration remains positively associated with patient survival after adjusting age and tumor grade. In conclusion, epigenetic age acceleration is significantly associated with molecular subtypes and patient overall survival in gliomas, indication that epigenetic age acceleration has potential as a quantitative prognostic biomarker for gliomas.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAdultAgingDNA MethylationFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32692766
PMCPMC7373289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.