Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32692751›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2020

Effect of supplemental nutrition in pregnancy on offspring's risk of cardiovascular disease in young adulthood: Long-term follow-up of a cluster trial from India.

Sanjay Kinra, John Gregson, Poornima Prabhakaran, Vipin Gupta, Gagandeep Kaur Walia, Santhi Bhogadi, Ruby Gupta, Aastha Aggarwal, Poppy Alice Carson Mallinson, Bharati Kulkarni and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanjay KinraDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-4625
John GregsonDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Poornima PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.
Vipin GuptaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Gagandeep Kaur WaliaPublic Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8081-2284
Santhi BhogadiNational Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7713-8804
Ruby GuptaPublic Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.
Aastha AggarwalPublic Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8180-8743
Poppy Alice Carson MallinsonDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-8065
Bharati KulkarniNational Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-318X
Dorairaj PrabhakaranPublic Health Foundation of India, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3172-834X
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-8314
K V Radha KrishnaNational Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4557-2013
Shah EbrahimDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9438-1438
Hannah KuperDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8952-0023
Yoav Ben-ShlomoPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-3007
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPublic Health Foundation of India · INNational Institute of Nutrition · INUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Wellcome Trust 083707Wellcome Trust 084754Wellcome Trust 084774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUndernutrition during intrauterine life and early childhood is hypothesised to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Hypothesis), but experimental evidence from humans is limited. This hypothesis has major implications for control of the cardiovascular disease epidemic in South Asia (home to a quarter of world's population), where a quarter of newborns have low birth weight. We investigated whether, in an area with prevalent undernutrition, supplemental nutrition offered to pregnant women and their offspring below the age of 6 years was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease in the offspring when they were young adults. METHODS AND

findingsThe Hyderabad Nutrition Trial was a community-based nonrandomised controlled intervention trial conducted in 29 villages near Hyderabad, India (1987-1990). Protein-calorie food supplement was offered daily to pregnant and lactating women (2.09 MJ energy and 20-25 g protein) and their offspring (1.25 MJ energy and 8-10 g protein) until the age of six years in the 15 intervention villages, but not in the 14 control villages. A total of 1,826 participants (949 from the intervention villages and 877 from the control villages, representing 70% of the cohort) at a mean age of 21.6 years (62% males) were examined between 2009 and 2012. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the participants was 20 kg/m2 and the mean systolic blood pressure was 115 mm Hg. The age, sex, socioeconomic position, and urbanisation-adjusted effects of intervention (beta coefficients and 95% confidence intervals) on outcomes were as follows: carotid intima-media thickness, 0.01 mm (-0.01 to 0.03), p = 0.36; arterial stiffness (augmentation index), -1.1% (-2.5 to 0.3), p = 0.097; systolic blood pressure, 0.5 mm Hg (-0.6 to 1.6), p = 0.36; BMI, -0.13 kg/m2 (-0.75 to 0.09), p = 0.093; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, 0.06 mmol/L (-0.07 to 0.2), p = 0.37; and fasting insulin (log), -0.06 mU/L (-0.19 to 0.07), p = 0.43. The limitations of this study include nonrandomised allocation of intervention and lack of data on compliance, and potential for selection bias due to incomplete follow-up.

conclusionsOur results showed that in an area with prevalent undernutrition, protein-calorie food supplements offered to pregnant women and their offspring below the age of 6 years were not associated with lower levels of cardiovascular risk factors among offspring when they were young adults. Our findings, coupled with evidence from other intervention studies to date, suggest that policy makers should attach limited value to cardiovascular health benefits of maternal and child protein-calorie food supplementation programmes.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdolescentBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaMaleMalnutritionMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPregnancyRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32692751
PMCPMC7373266
OpenAlexW3036553443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.