Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32692691›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Regional Infoveillance of COVID-19 Case Rates: Analysis of Search-Engine Query Patterns.

Henry C Cousins, Clara C Cousins, Alon Harris, Louis R Pasquale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Forecasting and Surveillance of COVID-19 Spread Using Google Trends: Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. High variability in model performance of Google relative search volumes in spatially clustered COVID-19 areas of the USA.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henry C CousinsDepartment of Genetics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8694-0604
Clara C CousinsDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7874-0581
Alon HarrisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-3726
Louis R PasqualeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5835-3496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely allocation of medical resources for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) requires early detection of regional outbreaks. Internet browsing data may predict case outbreaks in local populations that are yet to be confirmed.

objectiveWe investigated whether search-engine query patterns can help to predict COVID-19 case rates at the state and metropolitan area levels in the United States.

methodsWe used regional confirmed case data from the New York Times and Google Trends results from 50 states and 166 county-based designated market areas (DMA). We identified search terms whose activity precedes and correlates with confirmed case rates at the national level. We used univariate regression to construct a composite explanatory variable based on best-fitting search queries offset by temporal lags. We measured the raw and z-transformed Pearson correlation and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the explanatory variable with out-of-sample case rate data at the state and DMA levels.

resultsPredictions were highly correlated with confirmed case rates at the state (mean r=0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.81; median RMSE 1.27, IQR 1.48) and DMA levels (mean r=0.51, 95% CI 0.39-0.61; median RMSE 4.38, IQR 1.80), using search data available up to 10 days prior to confirmed case rates. They fit case-rate activity in 49 of 50 states and in 103 of 166 DMA at a significance level of .05.

conclusionsIdentifiable patterns in search query activity may help to predict emerging regional outbreaks of COVID-19, although they remain vulnerable to stochastic changes in search intensity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansInternetModels, StatisticalPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPopulation SurveillancePublic Health InformaticsSARS-CoV-2Search EngineUnited StatesCOVID-19epidemiologyGoogle Trendsinfectious diseaseinfoveillanceinternet activitypublic healthsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32692691
PMCPMC7394521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.