Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32692627›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Smartphone-Enhanced Training, QA, Monitoring, and Evaluation of a Platform for Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges to Implementation in Tanzania.

Karen Yeates, Erica Erwin, Zac Mtema, Frank Magoti, Simoni Nkumbugwa, Safina Yuma, Wilma M Hopman, Alyssa Ferguson, Olola Oneko, Godwin Macheku and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Karen YeatesDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Erica ErwinDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Zac MtemaSkyConnect Company and Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Frank MagotiSkyConnect Company and Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Simoni NkumbugwaSkyConnect Company and Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Safina YumaMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Wilma M HopmanKingston General Health Research Institute; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Alyssa FergusonQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Olola OnekoKilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, Tanzania.
Godwin MachekuMawenzi Regional Referral Hospital, Mawenzi, Tanzania.
Agnes Feksi MteiMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Carter SmithQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Linda AndrewsQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Nicola WestPamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Milena DaltonABT Associates, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ashley NewcombSection for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Ophira GinsburgSection for Global Health, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUntil human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening is more affordable and widely available, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) is recommended by the WHO for screening in lower-resource settings. Visual inspection will still be required to assess the cervix for women whose screening is positive for high-risk HPV. However, the quality of VIA can vary widely, and it is difficult to maintain a well-trained cadre of providers. We developed a smartphone-enhanced VIA platform (SEVIA) for real-time secure sharing of cervical images for remote supportive supervision, data monitoring, and evaluation.

methodsWe assessed programmatic outcomes so that findings could be translated into routine care in the Tanzania National Cervical Cancer Prevention Program. We compared VIA positivity rates (for HIV-positive and HIV-negative women) before and after implementation. We collected demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and loss-to-follow-up data.

resultsFrom July 2016 to June 2017, 10,545 women were screened using SEVIA at 24 health facilities across 5 regions of Tanzania. In the first 6 months of implementation, screening quality increased significantly from the baseline rate in the prior year, with a well-trained cadre of more than 50 health providers who "graduated" from the supportive-supervision training model. However, losses to follow-up for women referred for further evaluation or to a higher level of care were considerable.

conclusionThe SEVIA platform is a feasible, quality improvement, mobile health intervention that can be integrated into a national cervical screening program. Our model demonstrates potential for scalability. As HPV screening becomes more affordable, the platform can be used for visual assessment of the cervix to determine amenability for same-day ablative therapy and/or as a secondary triage step, if needed.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansSecondary PreventionSmartphoneTanzania

Identifiers

PMID32692627
PMCPMC7392775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.