Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32691996›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Predictive value of pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio for overall survival for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Shaozhang Zhou, Wei Jiang, Huilin Wang, Ni Wei, Qitao Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prospective validation and extension of the Multimodality Prognostic Score for the treatment allocation of pleural mesothelioma patients.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic Value of Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio forInternational journal of general medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaozhang ZhouDepartment of Respiratory Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-4231
Wei JiangDepartment of Respiratory Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Huilin WangDepartment of Respiratory Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Ni WeiDepartment of No.5 Chemotherapy, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Qitao YuDepartment of Respiratory Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the relation between AAPR and OS in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted with 808 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated in Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital in China from 5 March 2009 to 31 August 2018. The target-independent and dependent variables were AAPR measured in patients before anticancer treatment and overall survival (OS), respectively. Covariates involved in this study included age, gender, ECOG status, smoking history, clinical stages, pathological type, driver mutation (EGFR or ALK), metastasis or not (bone, lung, liver, brain, malignant plural effusion, and other organs), number of organ metastasis(≤3, >3), first-line regiment and number of treatment lines (≤3, >3).

resultsThe mean age of the selected patients was 58.3 ± 10.9 years and 68.6% were male. We divided patients according to their AAPR into low (AAPR < 0.34, n = 266), medium (AAPR = 0.34-0.47, n = 259), and high (AAPR > 0.47, n = 283) tertile groups. Medium and high AAPR were associated with a decreased risk of death after fully adjusted Cox proportional hazard model(s) with hazards ratio (HR) 0.77 (95%CI = 0.58-1.03) and HR 0.59 (95%CI = 0.45-0.78), respectively (P for trend <.05). The median OS of low, medium, and high AAPR was 9.3, 11.8, and 16.9 months, respectively (P value <.0001). No optimal cutoff value of AAPR for prognosing OS was identified by smooth curve fitting. The HR and the 95% confidence intervals of the left and right sides of the inflection point 0.6 as cutoff value were 0.28 (95%CI = 0.14-0.57) and 0.77 (95%CI = 0.34-1.73), respectively (P value = .127). By subgroup analysis, similar results were consistently observed across nearly all the subgroups.

conclusionOur study implied that pretreatment AAPR can be used as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced NSCLC. This ratio should be applied for risk stratification and clinical decision-making in those patients.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChinaFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkers, TumorSerum AlbuminAAPRassociationNSCLCoverall survivalsubgroup analysis

Identifiers

PMID32691996
PMCPMC7476831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.