Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32691688›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychological rehabilitation2021

Current clinical practice in the screening and diagnosis of spatial neglect post-stroke: Findings from a multidisciplinary international survey.

Matthew Checketts, Mauro Mancuso, Helena Fordell, Peii Chen, Kimberly Hreha, Gail A Eskes, Patrik Vuilleumier, Andy Vail, Audrey Bowen

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From evidence to action: Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of spatial neglect in stroke patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. FoMo: A unifying theory of visual foraging.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding Occupational Therapists' Knowledge and Confidence When Assessing for Spatial Neglect: A Special Issue Review.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Matthew CheckettsDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-8242
Mauro MancusoPhysical and Rehabilitative Medicine Unit, National Health Service, Grosseto, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-9277
Helena FordellDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1650-8856
Peii ChenCenter for Stroke Rehabilitation Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6724-7046
Kimberly HrehaDivision for Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-3992
Gail A EskesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience & Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-9616
Patrik VuilleumierLaboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, Department of Fundamental Neurosciences & Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-9214
Andy VailCentre for Biostatistics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-2726
Audrey BowenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-1215
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBDalhousie University · CAOspedale Misericordia - Grosseto · ITRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUmeå University · SEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial neglect has profound implications for quality of life after stroke, yet we lack consensus for screening/diagnosing this heterogeneous syndrome. Our first step in a multi-stage research programme aimed to determine which neglect tests are used (within four categories: cognitive, functional, neurological and neuroimaging/neuromodulation), by which stroke clinicians, in which countries, and whether choice is by professional autonomy or institutional policy. 454 clinicians responded to an online survey: 12 professions (e.g., 39% were occupational therapists) from 33 countries (e.g., 38% from the UK). Multifactorial logistic regression suggested inter-professional differences but fewer differences between countries (Italy was an outlier). Cognitive tests were used by 82% (particularly by psychologists, cancellation and drawing were most popular); 80% used functional assessments (physiotherapists were most likely). 20% (mainly physicians, from Italy) used neuroimaging/ neuromodulation. Professionals largely reported clinical autonomy in their choices. Respondents agreed on the need for a combined approach to screening and further training. This study raises awareness of the translation gap between theory and practice. These findings lay an important foundation to subsequent collaborative action between clinicians, researchers and stroke survivors to reach consensus on screening and diagnostic measures. The immediate next step is a review of the measures' psychometric properties.

Indexed as

Perceptual DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAssessmentConsensusRehabilitationSpatial neglectStroke

Identifiers

PMID32691688
OpenAlexW3044667121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.