Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32691507›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2020

Uncertainty in model-based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis.

Roel Meiburg, Wouter Huberts, Marcel C M Rutten, Frans N van de Vosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Real-Time Digital Twin for Human Cardiovascular Applications.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Uncertainty in model-based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roel MeiburgDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-0915
Wouter HubertsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0779-4785
Marcel C M RuttenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Frans N van de VosseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient outcome in trans-aortic valve implantation (TAVI) therapy partly relies on a patient's haemodynamic properties that cannot be determined from current diagnostic methods alone. In this study, we predict changes in haemodynamic parameters (as a part of patient outcome) after valve replacement treatment in aortic stenosis patients. A framework to incorporate uncertainty in patient-specific model predictions for decision support is presented. A 0D lumped parameter model including the left ventricle, a stenotic valve and systemic circulatory system has been developed, based on models published earlier. The unscented Kalman filter (UKF) is used to optimize model input parameters to fit measured data pre-intervention. After optimization, the valve treatment is simulated by significantly reducing valve resistance. Uncertain model parameters are then propagated using a polynomial chaos expansion approach. To test the proposed framework, three in silico test cases are developed with clinically feasible measurements. Quality and availability of simulated measured patient data are decreased in each case. The UKF approach is compared to a Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) approach, a well-known approach in modelling predictions with uncertainty. Both methods show increased confidence intervals as measurement quality decreases. By considering three in silico test-cases we were able to show that the proposed framework is able to incorporate optimization uncertainty in model predictions and is faster and the MCMC approach, although it is more sensitive to noise in flow measurements. To conclude, this work shows that the proposed framework is ready to be applied to real patient data.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisComputer SimulationMarkov ChainsUncertaintyAortic ValveHumansTreatment Outcomeaortic stenosisMonte Carlo Markov chainparameter estimationpatient specificprediction uncertaintyunscented Kalman filter

Identifiers

PMID32691507
PMCPMC7583387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.