Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32691402›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2020

Performance, Effectiveness, and Efficiency of Honeybees as Pollinators of Coffea arabica (Gentianales, Rubiaceae).

J Hipólito, D O Nunes, C Angel-Coca, T Mahlmann, L Galetto, B F Viana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J HipólitoInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Estudos Inter e Transdisciplinares em Ecologia e Evolução - INCT IN-TREE, Bahia, Brasil. juhipolito@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-3143
D O NunesCoordenação de biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, CEP: 69.067-375, Brasil.
C Angel-CocaCoordenação de biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, CEP: 69.067-375, Brasil.
T MahlmannInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Estudos Inter e Transdisciplinares em Ecologia e Evolução - INCT IN-TREE, Bahia, Brasil.
L GalettoFacultad de CEFyN, Univ Nacional de Córdoba and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina.
B F VianaCoordenação de biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, CEP: 69.067-375, Brasil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInstituto Federal da Bahia · BRInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Doenças Tropicais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in crop plants analyzing floral biology in conjunction with effectiveness and efficiency of pollinators on pollen transfer and fruit formation are not common, although they are essential to provide better management actions. On this base, we selected a farm in Bahia, Brazil, to study pollination on coffee plants (Coffea arabica L.). Specifically, we want to analyze if nectar traits influence visitor's performance throughout flower lifetime and if honeybees (Apis mellifera scutellata Lepeletier, 1836) are effective and efficient for coffee pollination comparing fertilization and fructification among four experimental treatments: open (OP), wind (WP), cross (HCP), and single-visit bee pollination (SVBP). We found that honeybees collect both nectar and pollen from coffee flowers and transfer pollen on stigmas even after one visit. No differences were found among treatments regarding the number of pollen grains transferred on the stigmas (effectiveness). OP flowers showed a comparative lower efficiency (pollen tubes and fruit set) probably due to pollination failure as those flowers have a higher variability on the number of deposited pollen grains. Two of the treatments (HCP and SVBP) showed higher fertilization (measuring tubes until the end of the style). Pollen loads seem to be limited by a peak of pollen transference by pollinators, followed by the stabilization in the number of pollen grains deposited per stigma. Thus, reproduction of the coffee can be limited by the quality of pollen grains moved by pollinators instead of quantity. Management strategies should focus on monitoring bee density on plants for increasing pollen quality transfer on flowers trough maintaining the adequate proportions of seminatural habitats and/or the number of hives on agricultural fields according to the flowering of the crop.

Indexed as

PollinationAnimalsBeesBrazilCoffeaCrops, AgriculturalFlowersPollenChapada Diamantinamanagementpollinationyield

Identifiers

PMID32691402
OpenAlexW3045106483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.