ReviewDrugs2020
Functional Dyspepsia: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches.
Review in Drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation targets the brain-gut axis to treat functional dyspepsia: a scoping review of clinical evidence and mechanistic research.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Auricular acupoint therapy for functional gastrointestinal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Sihogyeji-tang on functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postoperative gastroparesis syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Zhishixiaopi decoction in functional dyspepsia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Patient-reported outcome measures in functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and COSMIN analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of Acupuncture Treatment for Postprandial Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of immunology research · 2022Pooled it
- Acupuncture as an Add-On Treatment for Functional Dyspepsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL-99 in the treatment of functional dyspepsia: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Article
- Symptom Overlap Stratifies Prokinetic Response in Functional Dyspepsia: A Real-World Multicenter Study of 1297 Chinese Patients.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Analysis of factors associated with comorbid anxiety and depression in patients with functional dyspepsia: a cross‑sectional study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Idiopathic achalasia: unraveling the etiology and pathogenesis of an inflammatory disease.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Article
- Entropy as a Tool for Quantifying Biomedical Signals: Gaps and Opportunities in Clinical Methodological Approaches-A Scoping Review.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Review
- From data mining to experimental validation: ST36 and CV12 as core acupoint combination for acupuncture in functional dyspepsia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Ganhai Weikang Capsules ameliorate functional dyspepsia in rats by modulating gut microbiota and host metabolic homeostasis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic insights into loperamide-induced gastric dysmotility: RNA-seq analysis of a mouse model.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Acupuncture's Multisystem Neuroimmunomodulation: Central-Peripheral Interactions in Gastroenteric, Psychiatric, and Chronic Pain Disorders.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Repurposing 1,4-Dihydropyridine Scaffold: 4-Imidazo[2,1-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional dyspepsia is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder of gastroduodenal origin, diagnosed clinically in the presence of prototypical symptoms of epigastric pain and meal-related symptoms, and without structural explanation. The most recent diagnostic criteria provide for two functional dyspepsia subtypes, epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) and post-prandial distress syndrome (PDS) based on the predominant symptom pattern. The evaluation of dyspepsia should keep laboratory, imaging, and invasive testing to a minimum, as extensive or repetitive investigations are of rather low diagnostic yield in the absence of localizing symptoms or alarm features. Factors with etiopathologic relationships to functional dyspepsia include micro-inflammation, GI infections, abnormalities of gastroduodenal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, disturbances along the brain-gut axis, and psychological factors; all of these causative mechanisms have potential to partially explain symptoms in some functional dyspepsia patients, thus providing a rationale for the efficacy of a diversity of therapeutic approaches to functional dyspepsia. Management of dyspepsia symptoms relies upon both pharmacologic treatments and non-pharmacologic approaches, including psychological and complementary interventions. The evidence in support of established functional dyspepsia therapies is reviewed, and forms the basis for an effective functional dyspepsia treatment strategy emphasizing the patient's current symptom severity, pattern, and impact on the function and quality of life of the individual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.