ArticleMolecular biology reports2020
Does survivin overexpression enhance the efficiency of fibroblast cell-based wound therapy?
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteolytic Activity of the Paracaspase MALT1 Is Involved in Epithelial Restitution and Mucosal Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-based wound therapy is faced with some limiting factors that decrease the therapeutic efficacy of transplanted cells. In this study, we aimed to genetically modify fibroblast cells with anti-apoptotic Survivin gene (Birc5) before cell transplantation. In vitro, pIRES2-eGFP-Survivin plasmid was transfected into the fibroblast cells and the growth curve was evaluated for transfected and normal cells performing MTT assay. In vivo, two 6-diameter cutaneous wounds were created at mice dorsal skin. Fibrin clot was used as a delivery vehicle to transfer cells into the wound bed. The effects of four treatment groups including (a) Cell-SVV-Clot (b) Cell-GFP-Clot, (c) Normal cell-Clot and, (d) Clot alone were evaluated. After 1,2,3,7 and 14 days post-transplantation, the wounds were photographed for evaluating the wound closure rate and wound samples were obtained. Angiogenesis and formation of granulated tissue were assessed via H&E staining for wound samples. The expression levels of Survivin, VEGF, and bFGF genes were also determined using qRT-PCR. The MTT assay showed similar proliferation potential of transfected cells with normal cells verifying that Survivin had no detrimental effect. Compared to the Normal cell-Clot group, the Survivin overexpression was seen for 3 days in the Cell-SVV-Clot group verifying the cell survival during the early stage of wound healing. The Survivin further upregulated VEGF and bFGF expressions resulting in more angiogenesis and formation of granulated tissue by day 3 and 14. The treated wounds with Cell-SVV-Clot were regenerated with a higher wound closure rate by day 7 compared to Normal cell-Clot and Clot groups. Survivin enhanced wound healing through induction of VEGF and bFGF at particular times post-wounding that led to a more structured-epidermis with higher angiogenesis and granulation tissue formation rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.