Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32691108›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2020

[Analysis of European concepts for specialization training in urology with special consideration of intersectoral further education].

M Himmler, J Westphal, T Speck, F Waldbillig, J König, M S Michel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M HimmlerKlinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
J WestphalKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Krankenhaus Maria Hilf der Alexianer Krefeld GmbH, Dießemer Bruch 81, 47805, Krefeld, Deutschland.
T SpeckMitglieder der Weiterbildungskonferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie (DGU), Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
F WaldbilligKlinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
J KönigMitglieder der AG Junge Urologen, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie (DGU), Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
M S MichelKlinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. Maurice-Stephan.Michel@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study is to compare the German specialization training in urology with other European concepts, to analyze regional differences and to evaluate the development of the personnel structure in urology in German hospitals and private practices for the last 5 years. In addition, possibilities for financial funding of residents in the outpatient sector will be analyzed. MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter analyzing the changes in the new Urology Specialization Training Regulations (Musterweiterbildungsordnung), the current urology training situation in Germany was evaluated in a European comparison. A trend analysis of the personnel structure in urology has been performed for recent years. Additionally, a possible intersectoral rotation concept was developed. Financial funding possibilities for urological residents were evaluated in a standardized telephone survey.

resultsCompared to other European countries, the exceptional position of German urology with its enormous spectrum becomes evident. In some states, there are already possibilities of financial support provided by regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Krankenversicherung) for the training of urological residents in private practices.

conclusionsWhile the organization of specialization training is commonly nation based in other European countries, there is heterogeneity in Germany due to the sovereignty of the states. Due to the shift of many specialization training contents towards the outpatient sector, alliances between clinics and practices in the sense of intersectoral training will become more important in the future. Therefore, the use of already existing funds and-as a long-term objective-a nationwide access to such funding is desirable.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyIntersectoral CollaborationCurriculumEuropeGermanyHumansSpecializationUrologyCurriculumRegulation on further educationResidentsRotationSpecialization training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.