Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32691007›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2020

Countermeasures to Coronavirus Disease 2019: Are Immunomodulators Rational Treatment Options-A Critical Review of the Evidence.

Daniel B Chastain, Tia M Stitt, Phong T Ly, Andrés F Henao-Martínez, Carlos Franco-Paredes, Sharmon P Osae

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel B ChastainUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Albany, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-0195
Tia M StittUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Albany, Georgia, USA.
Phong T LyUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Albany, Georgia, USA.
Andrés F Henao-MartínezDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Carlos Franco-ParedesDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Sharmon P OsaeUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Albany, Georgia, USA.
Georgia College & State University · USHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is associated with higher concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines that lead to lung damage, respiratory failure, and resultant increased mortality. Immunomodulatory therapy has the potential to inhibit cytokines and quell the immune dysregulation. Controversial data found improved oxygenation after treatment with tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 inhibitor, sparking a wave of interest and resultant clinical trials evaluating immunomodulatory therapies. The purpose of this article is to assess potential proinflammatory targets and review the safety and efficacy of immunomodulatory therapies in managing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus disease 2019.

Indexed as

ARDSCOVID-19cytokine stormSARS-CoV-2tocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID32691007
PMCPMC7313774
OpenAlexW3033828105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.