Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690947›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2020

Imprecise DNMT1 activity coupled with neighbor-guided correction enables robust yet flexible epigenetic inheritance.

Qiujun Wang, Guang Yu, Xuan Ming, Weikun Xia, Xiguang Xu, Yu Zhang, Wenhao Zhang, Yuanyuan Li, Chunyi Huang, Hehuang Xie and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qiujun Wang *Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, THU-PKU Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Guang Yu *Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, THU-PKU Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-2462
Xuan Ming *National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-1549
Weikun XiaCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, THU-PKU Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-6040
Xiguang XuEpigenomics and Computational Biology Lab, Fralin Life Sciences Institute at Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Yu ZhangSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Wenhao ZhangCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, THU-PKU Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yuanyuan LiSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Chunyi HuangSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Hehuang XieEpigenomics and Computational Biology Lab, Fralin Life Sciences Institute at Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Bing ZhuNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. zhubing@sun5.ibp.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2049-432X
Wei XieCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, THU-PKU Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. xiewei121@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-3849

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epigenome, including DNA methylation, is stably propagated during mitotic division. However, single-cell clonal expansion produces heterogeneous methylomes, thus raising the question of how the DNA methylome remains stable despite constant epigenetic drift. Here, we report that a clonal population of DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1)-only cells produces a heterogeneous methylome, which is robustly propagated on cell expansion and differentiation. Our data show that DNMT1 has imprecise maintenance activity and possibly possesses weak de novo activity, leading to spontaneous 'epimutations'. However, these epimutations tend to be corrected through a neighbor-guided mechanism, which is likely to be enabled by the environment-sensitive de novo activity ('tuner') and maintenance activity ('stabilizer') of DNMT1. By generating base-resolution maps of de novo and maintenance activities, we find that H3K9me2/3-marked regions show enhanced de novo activity, and CpG islands have both poor maintenance and de novo activities. The imprecise epigenetic machinery coupled with neighbor-guided correction may be a fundamental mechanism underlying robust yet flexible epigenetic inheritance.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCpG IslandsDatabases, GeneticDNADNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsHeredityMiceDNADNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1Dnmt1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.