ArticleLab animal2020
Endpoint in ovarian cancer xenograft model predicted by nighttime motion metrics.
Article in Lab animal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite several therapeutics showing promise in nonclinical studies, survival from ovarian cancer remains poor. New technologies are urgently needed to optimize the translation of nonclinical studies into clinical successes. While most nonclinical settings utilize subjective measures of physiological parameters, which can hamper the accuracy of the results, this study assessed the physical activity of mice in real time using an objective, non-invasive, cloud-based, digital vivarium monitoring platform. An initial range-finding study in which varying numbers of ovarian cancer cells were inoculated in mice was conducted to characterize disease progression using digital metrics such as motion and breathing rate. Data from the range-finding study were used to establish a motion threshold (MT) that might predict terminal endpoint. Using the MT, the efficacies of cisplatin and OS2966, an anti-CD29 antibody, were assessed. Results showed that MT predicted terminal endpoint significantly earlier than traditional parameters and correlated with therapeutic efficacy. Thus, continuous motion monitoring sensitively predicts terminal endpoint in nonclinical ovarian cancer models and could be applicable for drug efficacy testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.