Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690867›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2020

Radiogenomics for predicting p53 status, PD-L1 expression, and prognosis with machine learning in pancreatic cancer.

Yosuke Iwatate, Isamu Hoshino, Hajime Yokota, Fumitaka Ishige, Makiko Itami, Yasukuni Mori, Satoshi Chiba, Hidehito Arimitsu, Hiroo Yanagibashi, Hiroki Nagase and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Understanding the Conundrum of Pancreatic Cancer in the Omics Sciences Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yosuke Iwatate *Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Isamu Hoshino *Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan. ihoshino@chiba-cc.jp.
Hajime YokotaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Fumitaka IshigeDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Makiko ItamiDivision of Clinical Pathology, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Yasukuni MoriGraduate School of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiba University, Yayoi-cho 1-33, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan.
Satoshi ChibaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Hidehito ArimitsuDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Hiroo YanagibashiDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Hiroki NagaseLaboratory of Cancer Genetics, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitonacho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Wataru TakayamaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan.
Chiba Cancer Center · JPChiba University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiogenomics is an emerging field that integrates "Radiomics" and "Genomics". In the current study, we aimed to predict the genetic information of pancreatic tumours in a simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive manner, using cancer imaging analysis and radiogenomics. We focused on p53 mutations, which are highly implicated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and PD-L1, a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies.

methodsOverall, 107 patients diagnosed with PDAC were retrospectively examined. The relationship between p53 mutations as well as PD-L1 abnormal expression and clinicopathological factors was investigated using immunohistochemistry. Imaging features (IFs) were extracted from CT scans and were used to create prediction models of p53 and PD-L1 status.

resultsWe found that p53 and PD-L1 are significant independent prognostic factors (P = 0.008, 0.013, respectively). The area under the curve for p53 and PD-L1 predictive models was 0.795 and 0.683, respectively. Radiogenomics-predicted p53 mutations were significantly associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.015), whereas the predicted abnormal expression of PD-L1 was not significant (P = 0.096).

conclusionsRadiogenomics could predict p53 mutations and in turn the prognosis of PDAC patients. Hence, prediction of genetic information using radiogenomic analysis may aid in the development of precision medicine.

Indexed as

Imaging GenomicsMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMutationPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID32690867
PMCPMC7555500
OpenAlexW3042815543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.