Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32690746›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Cost-benefit analysis of surveillance for surgical site infection following caesarean section.

Catherine Wloch, Albert Jan Van Hoek, Nathan Green, Joanna Conneely, Pauline Harrington, Elizabeth Sheridan, Jennie Wilson, Theresa Lamagni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Single-use negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site complications in high-risk patients undergoing caesarean sections: a real-world study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Reducing Surgical Site Infections Post-Caesarean Section.International journal of women's health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Abdominal Cutaneous Thermography and Perfusion Mapping after Caesarean Section: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine WlochHealthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Public Health England, London, UK catherine.wloch@phe.gov.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9294-3588
Albert Jan Van HoekImmunisation, Hepatitis, and Blood Safety, Public Health England, London, UK.
Nathan GreenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Joanna ConneelyHealthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Public Health England, London, UK.
Pauline HarringtonHealthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Public Health England, London, UK.
Elizabeth SheridanHealthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Public Health England, London, UK.
Jennie WilsonRichard Wells Research Centre, University of West London, London, UK.
Theresa LamagniHealthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Public Health England, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the economic burden to the health service of surgical site infection following caesarean section and to identify potential savings achievable through implementation of a surveillance programme.

designEconomic model to evaluate the costs and benefits of surveillance from community and hospital healthcare providers' perspective.

settingEngland.

participantsWomen undergoing caesarean section in National Health Service hospitals.

main outcome measureCosts attributable to treatment and management of surgical site infection following caesarean section.

resultsThe costs (2010) for a hospital carrying out 800 caesarean sections a year based on infection risk of 9.6% were estimated at £18 914 (95% CI 11 521 to 29 499) with 28% accounted for by community care (£5370). With inflation to 2019 prices, this equates to an estimated cost of £5.0 m for all caesarean sections performed annually in England 2018-2019, approximately £1866 and £93 per infection managed in hospital and community, respectively. The cost of surveillance for a hospital for one calendar quarter was estimated as £3747 (2010 costs). Modelling a decrease in risk of infection of 30%, 20% or 10% between successive surveillance periods indicated that a variable intermittent surveillance strategy achieved higher or similar net savings than continuous surveillance. Breakeven was reached sooner with the variable surveillance strategy than continuous surveillance when the baseline risk of infection was 10% or 15% and smaller loses with a baseline risk of 5%.

conclusionSurveillance of surgical site infections after caesarean section with feedback of data to surgical teams offers a potentially effective means to reduce infection risk, improve patient experience and save money for the health service.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionSurgical Wound InfectionCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFemaleHumansPregnancyState Medicineepidemiologyhealth economicsmaternal medicine

Identifiers

PMID32690746
PMCPMC7375637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.